• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>SMU science and technology law review >Can You Keep a Secret?: Some Wish to Ban Encryption Technology for Fears of Data 'Going Dark'
【24h】

Can You Keep a Secret?: Some Wish to Ban Encryption Technology for Fears of Data 'Going Dark'

机译：您能保守秘密吗？：为了避免对数据的担心“黑”，有人希望禁止加密技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Apart from recent history, searching a criminal suspect's communications has generally been an unrealistic possibility. Before technological advancements, individuals conducted almost all communications in private, unsearchable contexts. Apart from written text, communications were undis- coverable. As society increasingly relies on technology to communicate, the government's ability to search and surveil has substantially expanded. Law enforcement has become accustomed to heightened search abilities in this era coined "the golden age of surveillance." People are increasingly communicating via mediums that travel through public channels. For convenience, a great percentage of the population carries devices that track many details of their life: conversations, finances, friends, calendars, and even location. As a result, law enforcement officials have grown accustomed to new investigation capabilities not possible just several decades prior; they may even feel entitled to these abilities. That people have sacrificed some privacy for convenience does not mean they have waived their constitutional rights. Just as technological advancements created the "golden age of surveillance," further advancements are now serving to restore privacy. Encryption reduces some capabilities recently enjoyed by law enforcement, and this development frustrates those tasked with investigating crime and securing the nation. Nonetheless, it is the right of the people to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures and to pursue the security of their informational privacy. Aside from the constitutional right to encrypt, efforts to prevent the use of encryption, while well-meaning, seem ill-considered. Financial crimes involving technological security breaches result in enormous economic loss; encryption is the best means to combat these crimes. Cyber threats pose one of the greatest dangers to our national security; encryption serves to defend against these threats. To hinder the use of encryption will likely cause more harm than it helps. Given the revelations made by Edward Snowden along with the unattainable standing requirements to challenge Fourth Amendment violations, many individuals perceive unlawful searches to be widespread, yet entirely un-redressable. Encryption, accordingly, may serve as the only means of securing fundamental constitutional rights involving informational privacy. This comment urges discontinuation of attempts to stifle the use of strong encryption. "The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding."
机译：除了最近的历史，搜索犯罪嫌疑人的来信通常是不现实的。在技​​术进步之前，个人几乎是在私人的，不可搜索的环境中进行所有通讯。除了书面文字，通讯还是不可或缺的。随着社会越来越依赖技术来进行交流，政府的搜索和监视能力已大大扩展。在这个被称为“监视的黄金时代”的时代，执法人员已经习惯了提高搜索能力。人们越来越多地通过通过公共渠道传播的媒体进行交流。为了方便起见，很大一部分人口都携带可​​跟踪生活细节的设备：对话，财务，朋友，日历甚至位置。结果，执法人员已经习惯了几十年前才有的新调查功能。他们甚至可能觉得有权使用这些功能。人们为了方便而牺牲了一些隐私并不意味着他们已经放弃了宪法权利。就像技术进步创造了“监视的黄金时代”一样，进一步的进步现在也可以用来恢复隐私。加密降低了执法部门最近享有的某些功能，这种发展使那些负责调查犯罪和保护国家的人员感到沮丧。但是，人民有权利免受不合理的搜查和扣押，并追求其信息隐私的安全。除了宪法规定的加密权之外，防止加密的使用虽然是出于善意的，但也被认为是错误的。涉及违反技术安全性的金融犯罪会造成巨大的经济损失；加密是打击这些犯罪的最佳手段。网络威胁是对我们国家安全的最大威胁之一。加密可抵御这些威胁。阻碍加密的使用可能会造成更大的危害。鉴于爱德华·斯诺登（Edward Snowden）的启示，以及挑战《第四修正案》违规行为所无法企及的要求，许多人都认为非法搜查是广泛的，但却是完全无法纠正的。因此，加密可能是确保涉及信息隐私的基本宪法权利的唯一手段。该评论敦促停止遏制使用强加密的尝试。 “自由的最大危险潜伏在热情，善意但不了解的人的阴险侵害中。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号