...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Computer Law Review and Technology Journal >The Limitations on Police Regarding GPS Tracking Devices: A Necessary Hindrance?
【24h】

The Limitations on Police Regarding GPS Tracking Devices: A Necessary Hindrance?

机译：关于GPS跟踪设备的警察局限性：必要的阻碍吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Article one, Section seven of the Washington Constitution states "no person shall be disturbed in his private affairs, or his home invaded, without authority of law." This section provides greater privacy protection than the United States Constitution. "Examination of the constitutional history of this section reveals that the State Constitutional Convention rejected the language of the federal constitution's Fourth Amendment; instead, the Convention adopted the language. . . to intentionally provide greater protection of individual rights." The problem arises when privacy comes face to face with technological advances, such as Global Positioning System ("GPS") devices. GPS units were first built for military use, but have since become popular in all aspects of today's society. For example, car manufacturers attach GPS units inside cars to locate the vehicle in case it is stolen. GPS units are being attached to level three sex offenders in order to cut down on the number of hours police haVe to spend monitoring the recipients. Unfortunately, citizens also use GPS systems to stalk other individuals as they drive. GPS tracking will impact the legal rights of millions of citizens.
机译：《华盛顿宪法》第1条第7条规定：“未经法律授权，任何人都不得在其私事上或其房屋被侵扰时受到打扰。”本部分提供了比美国宪法更大的隐私保护。 “对本节的宪法历史的审查表明，《州宪法公约》拒绝了联邦宪法第四修正案的措词；相反，该公约采用了该措辞……​​有意为个人权利提供了更大的保护。”当隐私与诸如全球定位系统（“ GPS”）设备之类的技术进步面对面时，就会出现问题。 GPS单位最初是为军事目的而建造的，但此后在当今社会的各个方面都变得很流行。例如，汽车制造商将GPS装置安装在汽车内，以防车辆被盗。 GPS装置被附加到三级性犯罪者上，以减少警察用于监视接收者的时间。不幸的是，市民在开车时也使用GPS系统跟踪其他人。 GPS跟踪将影响数百万公民的合法权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号