• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >China's new regulatory regime tailored for the sharing economy: The case of Uber under Chinese local government regulation in comparison to the EU, US, and the UK
【24h】

China's new regulatory regime tailored for the sharing economy: The case of Uber under Chinese local government regulation in comparison to the EU, US, and the UK

机译：中国当地政府监管下的外国政府监管案例的新监管制度 - 与欧盟，美国和英国相比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although Uber's arrival in China has resulted in disruptive competition for incumbent taxi companies, it offers an attractive alternative in China's supply-demand-imbalanced urban passenger transport system. China's regulatory regime for Uber has evolved in three stages: from the regulatory vacuum prior to 2015 to its official legalization in 2015-2016, and the enactment of numerous local regulations in 2016, with specific and more demanding requirements for Uber. This policy is a part of the Chinese approach to the gradual liberalization of the urban passenger transport market. Policymakers should consider 'fair competition' as the guiding principle to balance the interests of sharing firms and incumbent service providers, as well as between different sharing firms. The core value of this principle lies in the benefits it provides for consumers and the way it engenders a pro-competitive market environment. The labor protection arrangements for sharing firms' laborers should be more flexible and diversified. In order to recognize whether an Uber-Driver is an employee or independent contractor, a new standard taking into account a range of factors should be established through collective negotiations between the participants of the sharing economy, and dialogues between members of the judiciary, academics, and the policymakers. Further, consumer protection law and personal data protection provisions should apply when sharing firms misuse their distinctive algorithmic management model to compete unfairly to the detriment of consumers and other users. Ex ante regulatory measures designed to protect the personal data of users should be introduced for deployment in the context of the sharing economy. When enforcing these rules, a balance should be struck ensuring free data flow that is essential to sharing firms' innovation and competition, and the need to ensure the level of data security required to underpin a well-functioning sharing society. (C) 2019 Chenguo Zhang. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：尽管优雅的抵达中国已导致现任出租车公司的争斗竞争，但它在中国供应需求 - 不平衡的城市客运系统中提供了一个有吸引力的替代品。中国优步的监管制度已经三个阶段演变：2015年至2016年的监管真空，2016年至2016年的官方合法化，以及2016年颁布了众多当地法规，对优步的具体和更苛刻的要求。该政策是中国逐步自由化的中国乘客运输市场的一部分。政策制定者应考虑“公平竞争”作为平衡共享公司和现任服务提供者的利益以及不同共享公司之间的指导原则。本原则的核心价值在于它为消费者提供的好处，以及它从事竞争激烈的市场环境的方式。分享公司劳动者的劳动保护安排应更加灵活和多样化。为了认识到Uber-Driver是员工或独立承包商，还应通过分享经济参与者之间的集体谈判以及司法机构成员，学者之间的对话来建立一系列因素的新标准。和政策制定者。此外，当共享公司滥用其独特的算法管理模式时，应申请消费者保护法和个人数据保护条款，以不公平地争夺消费者和其他用户。应在共享经济的背景下介绍旨在保护用户个人数据的前栏杆监管措施。执行这些规则时，应达到余额，确保为共享公司的创新和竞争而是必不可少的数据流，以及确保支撑良好运作良好的共享社会所需的数据安全水平。 （c）2019成都张。 elsevier有限公司出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号