• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >Disclosure, Exposure and the 'Right to be Forgotten' after Google Spain: Interrogating Google Search's webmaster, end user and Lumen notification practices
【24h】

Disclosure, Exposure and the 'Right to be Forgotten' after Google Spain: Interrogating Google Search's webmaster, end user and Lumen notification practices

机译：谷歌西班牙之后的披露，曝光和“被遗忘的权利”：询问谷歌搜索的网站管理员，最终用户和流明通知实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article argues that Google's essentially blanket and unsafeguarded dissemination to webmasters of URLs delisted under the Google Spain judgment disclosures claimants' personal data, cannot be justified either on the purported basis of their consent or a legal requirement but instead seriously infringes European data protection standards. Such disclosure would only be compatible with the initially contextually sensitive context of collection where it was (i) reasonably necessary and explicitly limited to the purposes of checking the legality of the initial decision and/or bona fide research and (ii) prevented unauthorised repurposing or other misuse through robust safeguards. Strict necessity thresholds would need to apply where disclosure involved special categories of data or was subject to reasoned objection by a data subject and international transfers would require further controls, ideally as provided by the European Commission's standard contractual clauses. Disclosing identifiable data on removals to end users would directly and fundamentally undermine a data subject's rights and, therefore, ipso facto violate purpose limitation and legality, irrespective of whether rights are claimed in data protection, defamation or civil privacy. The public's legitimate interests in receiving information on personal data removals are best secured through safeguarded scientific research, which search engines should facilitate. (C) 2020 David Erdos. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：本文认为，谷歌基本上毯子和未被判断的传播对谷歌西班牙判决披露索赔人的个人资料，不能以据称的同意或法律要求的方式理解，而是严重侵犯欧洲数据保护标准。这些披露只会与最初的集合敏感性敏感的背景兼容，其中（i）合理必要，并明确限于检查初始决定和/或博纳诉讼研究的合法性的目的，并阻止未经授权的重新估算或其他滥用通过强大的保障措施。严格的必要性门槛需要申请披露涉及特殊类别的数据或受到数据主体的理由异议的情况，而国际转移将需要进一步控制，理想情况下，理想情况下，欧洲委员会的标准合同条款提供。披露关于最终用户的可识别数据将直接且根本地破坏数据主体的权利，因此，无论是否在数据保护，诽谤或民事隐私中声称权利是责任的，那么IPSO就会违反目的的限制和合法性。通过保障的科学研究，公众在收到个人数据移除信息的合法利益最佳，搜索引擎应该促进。 （c）2020 David Erdos。 elsevier有限公司出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号