...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Conservation Biology >Patterns of Citations of Open Access and Non-Open Access Conservation Biology Journal Papers and Book Chapters
【24h】

Patterns of Citations of Open Access and Non-Open Access Conservation Biology Journal Papers and Book Chapters

机译：开放获取和非开放获取保护生物学的引用方式期刊论文和书籍章节

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Abstract: Open access (OA) publishing, whereby authors, their institutions, or their granting bodies pay or provide a repository through which peer-reviewed work is available online for free, is championed as a model to increase the number of citations per paper and disseminate results widely, especially to researchers in developing countries. We compared the number of citations of OA and non-OA papers in six journals and four books published since 2000 to test whether OA increases number of citations overall and increases citations made by authors in developing countries. After controlling for type of paper (e.g., review or research paper), length of paper, authors’ citation profiles, number of authors per paper, and whether the author or the publisher released the paper in OA, OA had no statistically significant influence on the overall number of citations per journal paper. Journal papers were cited more frequently if the authors had published highly cited papers previously, were members of large teams of authors, or published relatively long papers, but papers were not cited more frequently if they were published in an OA source. Nevertheless, author-archived OA book chapters accrued up to eight times more citations than chapters in the same book that were not available through OA, perhaps because there is no online abstracting service for book chapters. There was also little evidence that journal papers or book chapters published in OA received more citations from authors in developing countries relative to those journal papers or book chapters not published in OA. For scholarly publications in conservation biology, only book chapters had an OA citation advantage, and OA did not increase the number of citations papers or chapters received from authors in developing countries.
机译：摘要：倡导开放式（OA）发布，作者，其机构或授权机构付款或提供一个存储库，通过该存储库可以免费在线进行同行评审的作品，以此作为增加每篇论文被引用次数的模型。广泛传播结果，尤其是向发展中国家的研究人员传播。我们比较了自2000年以来在6种期刊和4本书中出版的OA和非OA论文的引文数量，以检验OA是否增加了总体引文数量并增加了发展中国家作者的引文。在控制了论文的类型（例如评论或研究论文），论文的长度，作者的引文简介，每篇论文的作者人数以及作者或出版者是否在OA中发表论文之后，OA对OA没有统计学上的显着影响每篇期刊论文的引文总数。如果作者以前曾发表过被高引用的论文，或者是大型作者团队的成员，或者发表了相对较长的论文，则期刊论文的被引用频率更高，但是如果这些论文在OA来源中发表，则论文的引用频率不会更高。尽管如此，作者归档的OA书中的章节引用量是同一本书中无法通过OA获得的章节的八倍之多，这也许是因为没有针对该书章节的在线抽象服务。也几乎没有证据表明，与未在OA中发表的期刊论文或书籍章节相比，在OA中发表的期刊论文或书籍章节受到发展中国家作者的更多引用。对于保护生物学的学术出版物，只有书的章节具有OA引用的优势，而OA并没有增加从发展中国家的作者那里收到的引用论文或章节的数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号