• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Construction Management and Economics >Editorial
【24h】

Editorial

机译：社论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In light of the absence of a formal model of purchasing in building construction, Bildsten and Manley present findings supporting the definition of a framework covering different purchasing situations. The starting point of the study was a simple question: is there a framework to portray purchasing in building construction that would be recognized by companies as capturing their individual purchasing situations? The context was companies' purchases of products that included new services from suppliers and subcontractors, as well as new processes within the project. The framework covers all stages in the purchasing process and focuses on four factors: (1) purchasing situations; (2) level of complexity; (3) active roles; and (4) supply chain involvement. The framework was tested among a select number of companies in Queensland, Australia and is offered as an important step in formalizing understanding of purchasing situations in building construction. The findings confirm that the four factors have to be addressed by the companies if purchasing is to contribute to project success. The authors' expectation is that the framework will be used as a basis for understanding where improvement might be possible in companies' purchasing. Avenues of future research include testing the framework in other regions and contexts.
机译：鉴于在建筑施工中缺乏正式的采购模型，Bildsten和Manley提出了支持定义涵盖不同采购情况的框架的结论。该研究的出发点是一个简单的问题：是否存在一个框架来描述建筑施工中的购买，公司会认可该框架来记录他们的个人购买情况？背景是公司购买的产品，其中包括来自供应商和分包商的新服务，以及项目中的新流程。该框架涵盖了采购过程的所有阶段，并着重于四个因素：（1）采购情况； （2）复杂程度； （三）积极角色； （4）供应链参与。该框架已在澳大利亚昆士兰州的多家公司中进行了测试，并作为正式了解建筑施工中采购情况的重要步骤而提供。调查结果证实，如果采购要为项目成功做出贡献，则公司必须解决这四个因素。作者的期望是，该框架将用作了解公司采购中可能在哪些方面进行改进的基础。未来的研究方向包括在其他地区和环境中测试框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号