• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Construction Management and Economics >Are we on the same page? Exploring construction professionals' mental models of occupational health and safety
【24h】

Are we on the same page? Exploring construction professionals' mental models of occupational health and safety

机译：我们在同一页面上吗？探索建筑专业人士的职业健康与安全心理模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Photographic Q-methodology was used to explore construction professionals' mental models of occupational health and safety (OHS). Sixty Australian construction professionals participated in the research, including 15 architects, 15 engineers, 15 constructors and 15 OHS professionals. Participants were asked to sort photographs depicting different building systems into a grid based upon their judgement of the likelihood of accidental injury resulting from the construction of each of the building systems depicted. Responses ranged from Rare (-2) to Almost certain (+2). Sorting patterns relating to eight photographs of different facade systems were analysed using Q factor analysis. Three distinct sorting pattern types were identified in the data, representing clusters of participants whose sorting patterns were similar. These sorting pattern types cut across occupational/professional groups. Interpretation of the factors revealed substantial differences between the OHS judgements made by participants in the three clusters. Qualitative explanatory information revealed participants in the three clusters used different attributes when considering the likelihood of accidental injury. These attributes shaped their sorting patterns. The results suggest shared mental models (SMMs) are unlikely to exist in construction project teams, as each individual uses their own frame of reference to understand OHS. Opportunities exist to understand these different frames of reference and create more consistent team mental models of OHS. However, incorporating a diversity of viewpoints into project decision-making is recommended in order to produce effective decision-making in the choice or specification of building systems.
机译：摄影Q方法用于探索建筑专业人士的职业健康与安全（OHS）心理模型。 60名澳大利亚建筑专业人士参加了研究，其中包括15名建筑师，15名工程师，15名建筑商和15名OHS专业人员。要求参与者根据对每个所示建筑系统的构造造成的意外伤害可能性的判断，将描述不同建筑系统的照片分类为网格。响应范围从稀有（-2）到几乎确定（+2）。使用Q因子分析对与不同立面系统的八张照片相关的分类模式进行了分析。在数据中确定了三种不同的排序模式类型，代表了排序模式相似的参与者集群。这些分类模式类型跨职业/专业组。对这些因素的解释表明，在三个类别的参与者中，OHS判断之间存在实质性差异。定性解释性信息显示，在考虑意外伤害的可能性时，三个集群中的参与者使用了不同的属性。这些属性决定了它们的排序模式。结果表明，在建设项目团队中不太可能存在共享的心理模型（SMM），因为每个人都使用自己的参考框架来理解OHS。存在理解这些不同参考框架并创建更一致的OHS团队心理模型的机会。但是，建议将多种观点纳入项目决策中，以便在选择或指定建筑系统时产生有效的决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号