• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Construction Management and Economics >Inter-organizational unfairness in the construction industry
【24h】

Inter-organizational unfairness in the construction industry

机译：建筑业的组织间不公平

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

There are numerous examples of unfair inter-organizational business practices in the construction industry. Conflict and confrontation, corruption, bid-shopping, insecurity of payment and supply chain exploitation are just some examples which have been documented over several decades in many countries. There have been numerous initiatives to make the construction industry a fairer business environment, but these have been largely developed in a conceptual vacuum. Consequently, few advances have been made in making the industry a fairer place to do business. To address the lack of theory in this area and provide a conceptual foundation for future improvement, theories of organizational justice were used as the basis for a survey of 135 consultants, contractors, subcontractors and suppliers from across the Australian construction supply chain. The findings reveal that mainstream theories of justice may need refinement and reorganization to be applied to a construction industry context. Furthermore, in contrast to much previous research, the results indicate that levels of interpersonal, social and informational justice are high within the Australian construction industry. However, they also show that more can be done to improve levels of procedural and distributive justice, particularly in relation to subcontractors and suppliers in the construction supply chain. Many of these findings are transferable to other countries which are culturally, contractually and organizationally similar to the Australian construction industry.
机译：在建筑行业中，有许多不公平的组织间商业惯例的例子。冲突和对抗，腐败，竞标，付款不安全和供应链剥削只是一些例子，在许多国家中已记录了数十年。为了使建筑业成为一个更公平的商业环境，已经采取了许多举措，但是这些举措很大程度上是在概念真空中制定的。因此，在使该行业成为更公平的经商之地方面，进展甚微。为了解决该领域缺乏理论并为未来改进提供概念基础的问题，组织公正理论被用作对来自澳大利亚建筑供应链的135名顾问，承包商，分包商和供应商进行调查的基础。研究结果表明，主流的正义理论可能需要进行细化和重组，以应用于建筑行业。此外，与以往的许多研究相反，结果表明，澳大利亚建筑业的人际，社会和信息公正水平很高。但是，它们也表明，可以采取更多措施来提高程序和分配司法水平，尤其是在建筑供应链中的分包商和供应商方面。这些发现中有许多可以转移到与澳大利亚建筑业在文化，合同和组织上相似的其他国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号