...
首页> 外文期刊>Construction Management and Economics >Mediation in the Construction Industry: An International Review
【24h】

Mediation in the Construction Industry: An International Review

机译:建筑业的调解:国际回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This book is written by two academics. Its stated aim is to identify the emerging practices within construction mediation and to seek solutions to the many legal and commercial challenges facing mediation development. The editors claim that the book achieves the aim by the production of an international collection of monographs. This reviewer agrees it does. But the question has to be to what effect; why? The countries included are an eclectic mix: Australia, Germany, Hong Kong (SAR, China), Malaysia, New Zealand, South Africa, Turkey and England and Wales. I need to be clear from the start; I am a fan of books like this: international comparisons. There is much to be learned from other disciplines and the law has developed this into a discipline in its own right: comparative law. Comparative law is the study of differences and similarities between the law of different countries and it involves the study of different legal systems throughout the world. Of course globalization has increased the importance of comparative law. There are several texts in construction which use this comparative technique: e.g. liability and insurance (Knocke, 1995), conflict and dispute (Fenn et al., 1998) and now, mediation.
机译:这本书是由两位学者写的。其既定目标是确定建筑调解中正在出现的做法,并寻求解决方案,以解决调解发展面临的许多法律和商业挑战。编辑声称,这本书是通过制作国际专着来达到目的的。该评论员同意。但是问题必须是什么效果?为什么?包括的国家是折衷的混合体:澳大利亚,德国,香港(特区,中国),马来西亚,新西兰,南非,土耳其,英格兰和威尔士。我需要从一开始就清楚一点;我喜欢这样的书籍:国际比较。从其他学科中可以学到很多东西,法律已将其自身发展为一门学科:比较法。比较法是研究不同国家法律之间的差异和相似之处,涉及对全世界不同法律制度的研究。当然,全球化增加了比较法的重要性。在建筑中有几种使用这种比较技术的文字:责任与保险(Knocke,1995年),冲突与纠纷(Fenn等人,1998年)以及现在的调解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号