首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary social science >Using economic analysis to increase civic engagement
【24h】

Using economic analysis to increase civic engagement

机译:利用经济分析来提高公民参与度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two well-established insights of economic analysis are applied to four case studies on civic disengagement: the use of incentives implicit in supply-and-demand analysis and marginal analysis. The case studies comprise social security, housing benefit, hospital consultant outpatients and free school meals (FSMs). The case studies support the propositions that incentives can work or are thought to do so, and that the higher the take-up, the larger the benefit. But other factors can override, and significant proportions do not respond in the predicted way. In the case of the spare room subsidy, the policy-makers' goals were arguably unrealistic. In the case of Working Tax Credit and Pension Credit, the reasons are far from clear. Marginal analysis is used to quantify how much it could cost to increase take-up, when the take-up of a means-tested benefit is already nearly universal, as it had been for FSMs among primary school pupils. The chosen method, universal free provision for P1-P3 children, would seem disproportionate, unless the main reason for this policy has been to impact all children, and not just those who had been means tested. This case study shows the importance of marginal analysis when designing policies to increase civic engagement.
机译:在两个关于公民脱离接触的案例研究中,应用了两种公认的经济分析见解:使用了供需分析和边际分析中隐含的激励措施。案例研究包括社会保障,住房福利,医院顾问门诊病人和免费校餐(FSM)。案例研究支持以下论点:激励可以起作用或被认为可以起作用,并且采用率越高,收益越大。但是其他因素也可以忽略,很大比例的人不会以预期的方式做出反应。就备用房补贴而言,决策者的目标可以说是不现实的。就工作税收抵免和养老金抵免而言,原因尚不清楚。边际分析用于量化增加接受费用的成本,而接受经济状况调查的福利的接受已经几乎普及了,就像小学生中的FSM一样。所选择的方法,即为P1-P3儿童提供普遍免费服务,似乎不相称,除非该政策的主要原因是要影响所有儿童,而不仅仅是那些经过经济状况调查的儿童。该案例研究表明,在设计旨在提高公民参与度的政策时,边缘分析的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号