...
首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary social science >Social class inequalities in educational attainment: measuring social class using capitals, assets and resources
【24h】

Social class inequalities in educational attainment: measuring social class using capitals, assets and resources

机译:教育程度的社会阶层不平等:使用资格,资产和资源来衡量社会阶层

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is a plethora of measures of social class, and social stratification more widely. Occupation-based measures are most frequently used in social stratification research, although more recently the propriety of such approaches have been questioned. An emerging school of thought advocates the use of more culturally based measures as the most appropriate indicators of an individual's social class position, an argument predominantly influenced by the work of Bourdieu. In this paper, we evaluate the benefits of a social class measure with a Bourdieusian theoretical foundation compared with an orthodox neo-Weberian occupation-based social class measure, the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC). First, we assess how closely we can replicate the Bourdieusian social class measure reported in Savage et al. ([2013]. A new model of social class: Findings from the BBC's Great British class survey experiment. Sociology). Second, we aim to compare and contrast the capitals, assets and resources based social class measure with the occupation-based National Statistics Socio-economic Classification, in an analysis of inequalities in school GCSE outcomes.
机译:有一种夸张的社会阶层措施,社会分层更广泛。基于职业的措施最常用于社会分层研究,尽管最近这种方法的适当关系受到质疑。一个新兴的思想学院倡导利用更加文化的措施作为个人社会阶层职位的最合适的指标,这一论点主要受到Bourdieu工作的影响。在本文中,我们评估了社会阶级措施与Bourdieusian理论基础的好处与基于东正教的社会阶级衡量,国家统计社会经济分类(NS-SEC)相比。首先,我们评估我们在野蛮et al中报告的Bourdieusian社会阶段的措施。 ([2013]。一个新的社会阶级模型:BBC伟大的英国级调查实验的调查结果。社会学)。其次,我们的目标是将资本,资产和资源与基于占领的国家统计社会经济分类进行比较和造影,以分析学校GCSE成果的不平等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号