• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Critical Discourse Studies >Critique, the discourse-historical approach, and the Frankfurt School
【24h】

Critique, the discourse-historical approach, and the Frankfurt School

机译：批判，话语历史方法和法兰克福学派

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Critical discourse analysis (CDA) stands on the shoulder of giants - different giants - in order to answer how its critique, its ethico-moral stance, is theoretically grounded and justified. Concerning this question, this article explores the role of the Frankfurt School in the discourse-historical approach (DHA). Although references to the Frankfurt School can regularly be found in the DHA's canon, I argue that an even more comprehensive discussion would help in combating accusations of the DHA being unprincipled and politically biased, and further enrich the DHA's toolkit for empirical analysis. After reviewing existing references to the Frankfurt School, I discuss this intellectual tradition - from Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno's The dialectic of enlightenment to Jürgen Habermas's language-philosophy - showing to what extent it can(not) ground the DHA's emancipatory and socially transformative aims. Thereby, I illustrate how the DHA's critical standard is not simply based on a coincidental, though progressive, consensus but theoretically justified.View full textDownload full textKeywordscritique, discourse-historical approach, critical discourse analysis, Frankfurt School, Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Jürgen HabermasRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.533564
机译：批判性话语分析（CDA）站在巨人（不同的巨人）的肩膀上，以回答其批判，其伦理道德立场在理论上是如何立足和合理的。关于这个问题，本文探讨了法兰克福学校在话语历史方法（DHA）中的作用。尽管经常在DHA的教规中发现法兰克福学派，但我认为，进行更全面的讨论将有助于打击DHA毫无原则和政治偏见的指责，并进一步丰富DHA的经验分析工具。在回顾了有关法兰克福学派的现有参考文献之后，我将讨论这一思想传统-从马克斯·霍克海默（Max Horkheimer）和西奥多·W·阿多诺（Theodor W. Adorno）的“启蒙辩证法”到约尔根·哈贝马斯（JürgenHabermas）的语言哲学—显示其在多大程度上可以（不可以）扎根DHA的解放性和社会变革性目标。因此，我说明了DHA的批评标准如何不仅基于偶然的，尽管是渐进的，共识的，而且在理论上是合理的。查看全文下载全文关键词批评，话语历史方法，批评性话语分析，法兰克福学派，马克斯·霍克海默，西奥多·W·阿多诺，JürgenHabermas相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，services_compact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”} ;添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.533564

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号