• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Critical Discourse Studies >Performing citizenship on YouTube: activism, satire and online debate around the anti-Islam video Fitna
【24h】

Performing citizenship on YouTube: activism, satire and online debate around the anti-Islam video Fitna

机译：在YouTube上表现公民身份：围绕反伊斯兰视频Fitna的行动主义，讽刺和在线辩论

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this article we examine the hundreds of videos that were posted to YouTube in response to the fierce anti-Islam video Fitna. We use this case to analyse whether and how the participatory opportunities of the digital technologies invite performances of citizenship, especially with respect to the articulation of religious and/or political identity. The sheer numbers of YouTube activities (videos, views and comments) demonstrated that this was not at all a marginal phenomenon within the wider Fitna and Wilders controversy, making the question as to what these videos mean, or - to be more precise - for which contexts the posters make them meaningful, all the more pressing. We used the concepts of ‘voice’, ‘performance’ and ‘citizenship’ to approach this issue and found that the video genres unique to visual digital culture (tagging/jamming, cut-and-mix and vlogs) each invited their own kinds of political and religious performances, and assumed particular traits and interests of their audience. The most common YouTube reaction for Muslims was to upload copies of videos that expressed their own understanding of Islam as a peaceful religion in contrast to the picture drawn by Wilders. The jamming videos saying sorry were unique digital means of activism, enabling a particular participation in the controversy around Fitna that assumed a global audience open to apology. The cut-and-mix videos appeared to be especially welcome means for satire and parody, and appealing to audience emotions, but also for the deconstruction of Fitna, which addressed audience cognitive competence. Vlogging about Fitna was often part of a more regular practice of video production that was individually or institutionally maintained. We conclude that the particular articulations of religious and political identities, with different modes of audience address assume a connectedness between dispersed people in which new forms of (unlocated) citizenship emerge.View full textDownload full textKeywordscitizenship, Islam, YouTube, Fitna , Wilders, voiceRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2010.511831
机译：在本文中，我们研究了针对激烈的反伊斯兰视频Fitna发布到YouTube的数百个视频。我们使用此案例来分析数字技术的参与机会是否以及如何吸引公民身份的表现，特别是在表达宗教和/或政治身份方面。 YouTube活动的数量（视频，观看次数和评论）数量众多，这表明在更广泛的Fitna和Wilders争议中，这根本不是一种边缘现象，这使人们质疑这些视频的含义，或者-更确切地说-情境使海报变得有意义，而且更加紧迫。我们使用“语音”，“性能”和“公民身份”的概念来解决这个问题，并发现视频流是视觉数字文化特有的（标记/干扰，剪切和混合）和视频博客）各自邀请了自己的各种政治和宗教表演，并表现出听众的特殊特征和兴趣。 YouTube对穆斯林的最普遍反应是上传录像带，这些录像带表达了他们对伊斯兰教是和平宗教的理解，而与维尔德斯的图画相反。令人难忘的录像中说对不起是独特的数字化行动手段，使人们特别参与了围绕Fitna的争议，而这场争议使全球观众都向道歉开放。混音视频似乎是讽刺和戏仿，吸引听众情绪的特别受欢迎的手段，同时也是解构Fitna（解决听众认知能力）的特别受欢迎的方式。对Fitna进行视频博客通常是个人或机构维护的更常规视频制作实践的一部分。我们得出的结论是，具有不同受众表达方式的特定宗教和政治身份表达假设了分散的人们之间的联系，其中出现了新形式的（未定位）公民身份。查看全文下载全文关键字公民身份，伊斯兰教，YouTube，Fitna，Wilders，语音相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}；添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2010.511831

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号