...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Trends >Mapping cultural assets and evaluating significance: theory, methodology and practice
【24h】

Mapping cultural assets and evaluating significance: theory, methodology and practice

机译：绘制文化资产并评估重要性：理论，方法和实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Over the last decade in the UK, there has been a notable shift in the popularity and use of cultural mapping as a methodology for policy making at a regional and local level. This follows increased demand for an informed framework for planning arts and cultural facilities from local and regional government and from within the cultural sector (Evans, 2008: p. 65). The article begins with an exploration of cultural mapping within cultural policy, which explores the context for the growth in this area of activity, and why this kind of activity appeals to policy makers and organisations. It then goes on to examine four cultural mapping exercises which have been undertaken in recent years in the UK. These studies have been chosen because although they all focus the mapping of cultural assets within a specific geographic area, they differ to one degree or another in purpose, context, definition, geographic scale and methodology. They illustrate the narrow range of approaches deployed in the cultural mapping field in the UK, and as such provide a useful means of critically reviewing their limits as well as highlighting the issues and challenges faced by cultural cartography in practice. The article concludes by considering the type of mapping research that is “allowed” within the discursive confines of consultancy based cultural policy research.View full textDownload full textKeywordscultural planning, housing growth areas, cultural mapping, evidence based policy, cultural significanceRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2012.641757
机译：在过去的十年中，在英国，文化制图的流行和使用发生了显着变化，作为地区和地方一级的决策方法。随之而来的是，地方和地方政府以及文化部门对规划艺术和文化设施的知情框架的需求不断增加（Evans，2008：65）。本文首先探讨了文化政策中的文化映射，探讨了该活动领域的增长背景，以及这种活动为何吸引政策制定者和组织。然后，它继续研究了近年来在英国进行的四次文化地图绘制活动。之所以选择这些研究，是因为尽管它们都集中于特定地理区域内文化资产的制图，但是它们在目的，背景，定义，地理规模和方法上有不同程度的差异。它们说明了在英国的文化制图领域中所采用的方法范围很窄，因此提供了一种有用的手段，可以严格地审查其局限性，并突出实践中文化制图所面临的问题和挑战。本文的结论是考虑基于咨询的文化政策研究的话语范围内允许的地图研究类型。查看全文下载全文关键词文化规划，住房增长区域，文化地图，循证政策，文化意义相关变量addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2012.641757

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号