• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cybernetics & Human Knowing >On Different Uses of Difference Post-ontological Thought in Derrida, Deleuze, Luhmann, and Rorty
【24h】

On Different Uses of Difference Post-ontological Thought in Derrida, Deleuze, Luhmann, and Rorty

机译：德里达，德勒兹，卢曼和罗蒂关于差异后本体论思想的不同用法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

When drawing a distinction between classical philosophy of identity and contemporary philosophy of difference, we tend to overlook crucial differences between the various philosophies of difference. In this article, an argument in favour of focusing on the different uses that are made of difference is presented. Thus, it investigates four central theoreticians of difference, Derrida, Deleuze, Luhmann, and Rorty in order to show how they differ from each other in spite of the fact that they all opt for a post-ontological philosophy of difference. The investigation is undertaken with the help of two central distinctions. Firstly, the radical attack on discursive order as such (typical for Derrida and Deleuze) is opposed to the evolutionary attempt to give up classical conceptuality in order to settle on new territories (to be found in Luhmann and Rorty). Secondly, a distinction is drawn between the use of difference as the heart of a theoretical enterprise (as can be seen in Derrida and Luhmann) and the use of difference for pragmatic purposes only (shared by Deleuze and Rorty). In conclusion, it is suggested that the four philosophies of difference are used as different means for different purposes.
机译：在区分古典身份哲学和当代差异哲学之间的区别时，我们倾向于忽略各种差异哲学之间的关键差异。在本文中，提出了一种论点，该论点旨在关注于差异带来的不同用途。因此，本文研究了差异的四个中心理论家，德里达，德勒兹，卢曼和罗蒂，以表明他们之间的差异，尽管他们都选择了本体论后哲学。该调查是在两个主要区别的帮助下进行的。首先，对话语秩序的激进攻击（对于德里达和德勒兹而言是典型的）与放弃经典概念以在新领土上定居的进化尝试相反（在卢曼和罗蒂中可以找到）。其次，区分使用差异作为理论事业的核心（如在德里达和卢曼所见）与仅将差异用于务实目的（由德勒兹和罗蒂共享）。总之，建议将四种不同的哲学用作针对不同目的的不同手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号