...
首页> 外文期刊>Dao >What’s in a Dao?: Ontology and Semiotics in Laozi and Zhuangzi
【24h】

What’s in a Dao?: Ontology and Semiotics in Laozi and Zhuangzi

机译:道中有什么?:老子和庄子中的本体论和符号学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present essay examines the conflicting ontological assumptions that one can find behind the word dao in the texts of the Laozi and Zhuangzi and argues that the relative indifference to these texts toward whether or not dao has an ontic reality should not be considered a flaw of early Daoism. Rather, the historical process by which the term dao collects various possible ontological implications can be thought of as a philosophical stance in its own right. That is, if the terms which one is obliged to use in discussing the immaterial necessarily hide, at least as much as they explain, the nature of Being, then it is a reasonable response to decline to ground one’s ethics in an ontology, and that while the resulting philosophy may not qualify as a fully-adumbrated system, this does not diminish its potential usefulness.
机译:本文探讨了在老子和庄子的文字中可以找到“道”一词背后存在的矛盾的本体论假设,并认为,对于道是否具有本体论的现实,相对于这些文本的冷漠不应被认为是早期的缺陷。道教相反,道(道)一词收集各种可能的本体论含义的历史过程本身可以被认为是一种哲学立场。就是说,如果在讨论非物质性时必须使用的术语至少隐藏了它们所解释的内容,那这是对在本体论中拒绝道德基础的合理回应,并且尽管由此产生的哲学可能不符合完全概括的体系,但这并没有削弱其潜在的实用性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dao》 |2012年第4期|p.419-436|共18页
  • 作者

    Daniel Fried;

  • 作者单位

    Departtment of East Asian Studies, University of Alberta, 305 Pembina Hall, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Laozi; Zhuangzi; Dao; Ontology; Semiotics;

    机译:Lao字;Z皇子;DAO;ontology;semiotics;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号