首页> 外文期刊>Dao >The Doubleness of Craft: Motifs of Technical Action in Life Praxis according to Aristotle and Zhuangzi
【24h】

The Doubleness of Craft: Motifs of Technical Action in Life Praxis according to Aristotle and Zhuangzi

机译:工艺的双重性:亚里士多德和庄子的生活实践中的技术动作母题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article offers a philosophical reflection on ambivalences inherent in the notion of craft analogy in the thought of Zhuangzi and Aristotle. Does it make sense to establish the analogy between the structure of the good conduct of life and the structure of the successful performance of craft? In turn, what are the reasons for rejecting this analogy? This study shows that both philosophers had strong reasons both for their commitment to some aspects of the analogy and for its decisive denial in other respects. However, their particular reasons for this ambiguous view on the craft analogy are remarkably different and even opposite. This divergence owes to some central cosmological and ontological commitments that undergird their theories of action; while Aristotle’s conception of the human world calls for conscious interference and deliberate action, Zhuangzi’s view is that ideal action should spontaneously follow the order immanent in all things.
机译:本文对“庄子”和“亚里士多德”思想中工艺比喻概念中固有的矛盾性进行了哲学思考。在生活的良好行为结构与成功的手工艺结构之间建立类比是否有意义?反过来,拒绝这种类比的原因是什么呢?这项研究表明,两位哲学家都有强烈的理由说明他们对类比的某些方面的承诺以及对其他方面的决定性否定。然而,他们对工艺类比的模棱两可的看法的特殊原因是截然不同的,甚至是相反的。这种差异归因于一些基本的宇宙论和本体论承诺,这些承诺支撑了他们的行动理论。亚里士多德关于人类世界的观念要求有意识的干预和有意识的行动,而庄子的观点是理想的行动应该自发地遵循万物固有的秩序。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dao》 |2011年第4期|p.507-526|共20页
  • 作者

    David Machek;

  • 作者单位

    Department of East Asian Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Theory of action; Craft; Deliberation; Spontaneity;

    机译:行动理论;工艺;审议;自发性;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号