...
首页> 外文期刊>Dao >Lin, Anwu 林安梧, Misplaced Dao: The Essential Problem of Chinese Political Thought 道的錯置—中國政治思想的根本困結
【24h】

Lin, Anwu 林安梧, Misplaced Dao: The Essential Problem of Chinese Political Thought 道的錯置—中國政治思想的根本困結

机译:Lin, Anwu 林安梧, Misplaced Dao: The Essential Problem of Chinese Political Thought 道的错置—中国政治思想的根本困结

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This book, in eleven chapters and three appendices, is an accumulation of Lin’s under-nstanding of and investigation into the deficiency of Chinese traditional culture. The gist of itncan be traced back to 1979 when Lin wrote the essay, “The Entanglement of Intellectualismn(zhu zhi 主智), Beyond-intellectualism (chao zhi 超智), and Anti-intellectualism (fan zhi 反n智) in Chinese Political Tradition,” which is included in this book as Appendix 1, takingnissue with YU Yingshi’s 余英時 view in Yu’s “Anti-intellectualism and Chinese Tradition 反n智論與中國傳統.” To Lin, it is ambiguous for Yu to take Confucianism as intellectualism andnDaoism and Legalism as anti-intellectualism, to think that through the “Confucianism’sntending to Legalism 儒家法家化” the framework of Chinese political tradition was set, andneven to generalize Chinese political tradition as “anti-intellectualism.” Such tendency doesnexist. However, there is an entanglement of intellectualism, beyond-intellectualism, andnanti-intellectualism behind it.
机译:这本书分为11章和3个附录,是林书豪对中国传统文化不足的理解和调查的积累。 Itn的要点可以追溯到1979年,当时Lin撰写了论文《知识分子的纠缠(zhu zhi主智),超越智能主义(chao zhi超智)和反知识分子(fan zhi反n智)》。本书作为附录1包含在《政治传统》中,并引用了余英时的余英时观点。在余的“反智主义与中国传统反n智论与中国传统”中。对林来说,俞以儒学为知识分子,以道教和法制为反智主义,认为通过“儒家对法家的追求”儒家法家化,确立了中国政治传统的框架,甚至没有将中国概括为中国,这是模棱两可的。政治传统为“反思想主义”。这种趋势不存在。然而,其背后却存在着知识主义,超越智力主义和反智力主义的纠缠。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号