...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe >From the Idea of Self-Management to Capitalism: The Characteristics of the Polish Transformation Process
【24h】

From the Idea of Self-Management to Capitalism: The Characteristics of the Polish Transformation Process

机译：从自我管理的思想到资本主义：波兰转型过程的特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Polish “Solidarity” was the largest independent self-governing mass movement in the Eastern European region, which after the transition fell apart. This article is seeking to answer the question; how could pure market capitalism also be established in Poland, which fully contradicted the “Solidarity” self-governing socialism theory? How was it that such a large mass movement could disappear under these new circumstances? The Polish opposition activists (Kuroń, Modzelewski, Kołakowski, Brus, Michnik) wanted to establish a “self-governing socialism” together with the working class from the middle of the 1960s. In the years 1980-81 this was also established for a short period during the “Solidarity”. After the introduction of Martial law, due to the world economic system, the indebtedness of socialist economics and the pressure of international financial institutions it was impossible to resolve the crisis in a “socialist way”. In addition to this the revolutionary changes within the industry scattered the classical working class, which was the basis of the “Solidarity”. This article strives to answer these questions based on archive documentation, while comparing Polish events with Hungarian. This article finds it is important to analyze the role of historical traditions and the transformation of the world economic system at the same time. This shows the specialities and resemblances of the countries in the Central Eastern European region.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0965156X.2010.509094
机译：波兰的“团结”是东欧地区最大的独立的自治群众运动，在过渡之后分崩离析。本文试图回答这个问题。在波兰如何建立完全与“团结”自治社会主义理论相矛盾的纯市场资本主义？在这样的新形势下，如此大规模的群众运动怎么会消失呢？波兰反对派激进主义者（KuroÅ„，Modzelewski，KoÅakowski，Brus，Michnik）希望与工人阶级一起建立“自治的社会主义”，直到1960年代中期。在1980-81年间，在“团结”期间也建立了很短的时间。实行戒严令后，由于世界经济体系，社会主义经济学的欠债和国际金融机构的压力，不可能以“社会主义方式”解决危机。除此之外，行业内的革命性变化分散了古典工人阶级，这是“团结”的基础。本文力求根据存档文档回答这些问题，同时将波兰事件与匈牙利事件进行比较。本文发现，同时分析历史传统的作用和世界经济体系的转变很重要。这显示了东欧中部国家的特色和相似之处。 ，stumbleupon，digg，google，more“，发布号：” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0965156X.2010.509094

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号