• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Decision Sciences >Multitier Incentive Strategies for Quality Improvement: Case of Three-Tier Supply Chain
【24h】

Multitier Incentive Strategies for Quality Improvement: Case of Three-Tier Supply Chain

机译：高质量改进的多层激励策略：三层供应链的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study investigates a final assembler's (FA) incentive strategies for quality management in the multitier supply chain context. FAs often decide to manage a second‐tier supplier in a reactive way when the first‐tier supplier is unable to control the former. In our model, an FA proactively looks upstream to its first‐tier (S1) and second‐tier (S2) suppliers in a three‐tier supply chain. We develop four proactive strategies with incentives and one reactive strategy with no incentive. We find that, first, proactive strategies are better at improving quality, demand, and profit than reactive strategies are. Second, among proactive strategies, the parallel incentive strategy, centrally controlling both the S1 and S2, imposes the fewest restrictions. It yields superior quality and profit performance for the entire supply chain as well as for individual suppliers. Third, when the tiers are sequentially controlled, proactive incentive strategies promise superior profits for the FA if its unit profitability is not sufficiently high. Finally, the reactive strategy may be more appropriate if the FA's profitability is lower than that of the S1 or S2.
机译：本研究调查了最终的汇编者（FA）在多层供应链环境中为质量管理的激励策略。当第一层供应商无法控制前者时，FAS通常决定以反应方式管理二线供应商。在我们的模型中，在三层供应链中主动地向其上游查找到其第一层（S1）和二线（S2）供应商。我们开展了四种主动策略，激励措施和一个无能为力的战略，没有动机。我们发现，首先，主动策略更好地提高质量，需求和利润而不是反应策略。其次，在积极主动策略中，并行激励策略，集中控制S1和S2，施加了最少的限制。它为整个供应链以及个别供应商带来了卓越的品质和利润性能。第三，当依次控制层时，如果其单位盈利能力不够高，主动激励策略承诺对FA的卓越利润。最后，如果FA的盈利能力低于S1或S2，则反应策略可能更为合适。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号