• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>DMJ: Defence Management Journal >Prioritising Portsmouth
【24h】

Prioritising Portsmouth

机译：优先考虑朴茨茅斯

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Speculation, fuelled in part by the President of the Board of Trade, has it that Portsmouth shipyard will close for build work (although maintenance work will be retained). Naturally, Portsmouth's economic future is at the fore of my mind, but I am equally concerned about sovereign capabilities and the affordability of the future fleet. The result of the last two decades of MoD policy is that we are not a country rich in terms of defence companies queuing up to build ships. Industry is keen to provide services for ships, but fails to realise that this is more likely if it builds them too. This makes things tough for a government that must fund the future fleet, but the difficulties of UK industry must not be allowed to shape such important strategic decisions. We must be able to build our own ships and find the budget to do so. Portsmouth is well placed to support both requirements.
机译：由于贸易委员会主席的部分推动，人们猜测朴茨茅斯造船厂将关闭进行建造工作（尽管将保留维护工作）。自然，朴茨茅斯的经济未来是我的主意，但我同样关注主权能力和未来机队的承受能力。国防部政策过去二十年的结果是，就国防公司排队建造船只而言，我们不是一个富裕的国家。工业界渴望为船舶提供服务，但未能意识到如果也建造船舶，这种可能性更大。对于必须为未来机队提供资金的政府而言，这使事情变得艰难，但绝不能允许英国工业界的困难来制定如此重要的战略决策。我们必须能够建造自己的船并找到预算。朴茨茅斯完全可以满足这两个要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号