【24h】

Assessing the damages

机译:评估损害赔偿

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is 25 years since the then-government repealed section 10 of the Armed Forces (Crown Proceedings) Act, allowing members of the armed forces to be placed at the same advantage as their civilian counterparts and bring a common law claim through the courts if the MoD, as their employer, was found to be negligent in any way.It has been seven years since the MoD reviewed military pensions and created the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS), a system providing recompense for all injuries, ill-health and deaths attributable to service. What many don't realise or understand is that despite the introduction of the scheme, a civil negligence claim is still possible.
机译:自当时的政府废除了《武装部队(官方诉讼)法》第10条以来已有25年的历史了,这部法律允许武装部队成员与文职人员享有同等的利益,并在法院提出普通法要求的情况下,自从国防部审查了军事养老金并制定了武装部队补偿计划(AFCS)以来,已经有7年了,国防部作为其雇主在任何方面都存在过失。该系统可为所有伤害,疾病和死亡提供补偿归因于服务。许多人没有意识到或理解的是,尽管引入了该计划,但民事过失索赔仍然是可能的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号