• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Defence Studies >Air power in humanitarian intervention: Kosovo and Libya in comparative perspective
【24h】

Air power in humanitarian intervention: Kosovo and Libya in comparative perspective

机译：人道主义干预中的空中力量：比较视角的科索沃和利比亚

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It would be hard to overstate the importance of air power in humanitarian intervention (HI) and the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). Yet, the role of air power in HI and R2P has been understudied. This article seeks to remedy the lack of systematic investigation. It does so by developing a framework for assessing the effectiveness of air power during military operations in HI and R2P and applies it to NATO's air campaigns in Kosovo (Operation Allied Force) and Libya (Operation Unified Protector). Upon examination NATO is revealed to have fared better in Libya than Kosovo in positively accomplishing its stated humanitarian objectives, minimizing collateral damage and reducing the costs for the interveners, all of which are aspects considered by the model. The relative effectiveness of Operations Unified Protector is generally attributed to geography, diplomacy and technology. It is argued that better ground support, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and burden sharing are needed to enhance the utility of air power in HI and R2P even further.
机译：很难夸大空中力量在人道主义干预（HI）和保护责任（R2P）中的重要性。但是，空中力量在HI和R2P中的作用尚未得到充分研究。本文旨在弥补系统性调查的不足。为此，它制定了一个评估HI和R2P军事行动期间空中力量有效性的框架，并将其应用于北约在科索沃（联合行动）和利比亚（统一保护行动）的空中运动。经审查，北约在利比亚积极实现其既定的人道主义目标，最大程度地减少附带损害并减少干预者的费用方面，比科索沃的表现要好。所有这些都是该模式考虑的方面。 Operations Unified Protector的相对有效性通常归因于地理，外交和技术。有人认为，需要更好的地面支持，无人飞行器（UAV）和负担分担，以进一步增强HI和R2P中的空中力量效用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号