• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Defence Studies >Defence industrial policy - a sound security strategy or an economic fallacy?
【24h】

Defence industrial policy - a sound security strategy or an economic fallacy?

机译：国防工业政策-完善的安全策略还是经济谬误？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article explores whether it makes sense for national governments to employ defence industrial policies - such as offsets and discriminatory procurement practices - to support their domestic defence industries. This question has so far primarily been discussed by economists, who have argued strongly against the use of defence industrial policies. This article maintains that these economists fail to address the often complex motivation behind the introduction of these policies. It illustrates these shortcomings by contrasting their arguments against a case study of Norway, which accounts for the country's use of defence industrial polices from the early post-Second World War era up until today. The article concludes that, depending on their objectives, defence industrial policies can be seen as either a sound security strategy or an economic fallacy.
机译：本文探讨了各国政府采用国防工业政策（例如补偿和歧视性采购做法）来支持其国内国防工业是否有意义。迄今为止，这个问题主要是由经济学家讨论的，他们强烈反对使用国防工业政策。本文认为，这些经济学家未能解决引入这些政策背后通常复杂的动机。通过对比他们对挪威的案例研究的论点来说明这些缺点，该案例研究说明了从第二次世界大战初期到今天该国对国防工业政策的使用。文章得出结论，根据国防工业政策的目标，可以将其视为健全的安全战略或经济谬误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号