• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Defence Studies >Questioning the 'Sanctity' of long-term defense planning as practiced in Central and Eastern Europe
【24h】

Questioning the 'Sanctity' of long-term defense planning as practiced in Central and Eastern Europe

机译：质疑中欧和东欧实行的长期国防计划的“神圣性”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It is an article of faith amongst many defense officials that long-term defense planning constitutes the gold standard in the development and management of modern armed forces. That such a method has become central to the U.S. and other countries' defense planning systems it is surprising that there is so little questioning of its contemporary relevance, let alone an understanding of its provenance, original intent, and its highly nuanced nature. Rather, what one finds on closer examination of long-term defense planning methods is that they have contributed to producing sub-optimal defense plans. In order to provide greater clarity and understanding of the utility of long-term defense plans, this essay argues that as a key element of PPBS, this planning method has been a failure when measured against the ability of defense institutions in Central and Eastern Europe to produce viable defense plans. To produce cost-informed and implementable defense plans, these defense institutions need to return to the original intend of this planning tool: to inform officials of long-term financial obligations and to enable informed decision-making to fund the current force.
机译：许多国防官员都相信，长期的国防计划是现代武装部队发展和管理的金标准。这种方法已经成为美国和其他国家的国防计划系统的中心，令人惊讶的是，对它的现代意义的质疑如此之少，更不用说对其起源，初衷和其高度细微差别的理解。相反，在仔细研究长期防御计划方法时发现，它们有助于制定次优的防御计划。为了使人们更清楚地了解和长期防御计划的实用性，本文认为，作为PPBS的关键要素，这种计划方法在衡量中欧和东欧国防机构的能力时是失败的。制定可行的防御计划。为了制定成本知情且可实施的防御计划，这些防御机构需要恢复该计划工具的初衷：将长期的财务义务告知官员，并使知情的决策能够为现役部队提供资金。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号