• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Defence Studies >The US perspective on future war: why the US relies upon Ares rather than Athena
【24h】

The US perspective on future war: why the US relies upon Ares rather than Athena

机译：美国对未来战争的看法：为什么美国依赖战神而不是雅典娜

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article addresses why the US in its military operations tends to focus on only one dimension in war - the military narrowly understood. More precisely, in the US case, its armed forces tend to be preoccupied with platforms and understand military capabilities as those that deliver death and destruction. I explain this one-sided understanding of the military dimension in war with how the US armed forces think about future war. How the US understands future war is, in turn, a reflection of how it organizes its long-term defense planning procedures. In particular, by approaching the concept of future as by and large structurally determined, a focus on platforms becomes natural. Investments in weapons systems, too, are more easily motivated to Congress since it is easier to attach a price to developing, for example, a new submarine than it is to attach a price to the cost of developing a military organization that is adaptive, learning and anticipating. The understanding of the future as something that happens whether you like it or not is particularly odd in the US context where of course a central tenet of the American dream is that the individual creates her own future.
机译：本文讨论了为什么美国在军事行动中往往只关注战争中的一个方面-军事上狭义的理解。更准确地说，以美国为例，其武装部队往往全神贯注于平台，并且将军事能力理解为能够造成死亡和破坏的能力。我用美军对未来战争的看法来解释这种对战争中军事层面的单方面理解。反过来，美国对未来战争的理解反映了美国如何组织其长期国防计划程序。特别是，通过在很大程度上由结构决定的方式来处理未来的概念，对平台的关注就变得自然了。同样，对武器系统的投资也更容易促使国会动用，因为对开发新型潜艇等产品要付出价格的代价要比为适应性学习的军事组织的发展付出代价要容易得多。和期待。在美国背景下，将未来理解为无论您是否喜欢都会发生的事情，这在美国尤为奇怪，因为美国梦的核心原则是个人创造自己的未来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号