• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Denver Journal of International Law and Policy >SOFT LAW FOR SOLID CONTRACTS? A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE VALUE OF THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS AND THE PRINCIPLES OF EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW TO THE PROCESS OF CONTRACT LAW HARMONIZATION
【24h】

SOFT LAW FOR SOLID CONTRACTS? A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE VALUE OF THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS AND THE PRINCIPLES OF EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW TO THE PROCESS OF CONTRACT LAW HARMONIZATION

机译：固体合同的软法？国际商事合同统一原则与欧洲合同法原则对合同法协调过程的价值比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The harmonization of international contract law is necessary to provide solutions to the questions raised by the globalization of business activities and contracts. However, no single instrument seems eligible to serve as a broad-based, universal source of such harmonization. Moreover, national laws have not been sufficiently adjusted.rnAs long as legislative instruments lack efficient rules for international transactions, the UP and PECL are viable alternatives to existing domestic and supranational laws governing cross-border contracts. Their extensive and independent drafting process, wide scope of applicability, and innovative structure have generated both criticism regarding the lack of legislative authority and acknowledgement with respect to their combination of comprehensiveness and practical solutions found in major contract law systems.rnThe Principles' comparative substance has also been welcomed as a profound contribution toward harmonization. The sets are (widely) similar in methodology, legal character, applicability, and contents. In practice, the UP have been especially well received by professionals (as rules governing contracts) and arbitral courts (as governing rules or to supplementing other instruments). The PECL have not had similar success, but it will most likely play a role as Europe moves toward the further enhancement of contract law unification.
机译：为了解决商业活动和合同全球化提出的问题，必须协调国际合同法。但是，似乎没有任何单一文书有资格充当这种统一的广泛基础，普遍来源。此外，国家法律还没有得到足够的调整。rn只要立法工具缺乏有效的国际交易规则，UP和PECL都是现有的管理跨境合同的国内和超国家法律的可行替代方案。他们广泛而独立的起草过程，广泛的适用范围以及创新的结构，既引起人们对立法权的缺乏的批评，又对主要合同法体系中的全面性和实际解决方案相结合产生了认可。也受到欢迎，作为对协调做出的重大贡献。这些集合在方法，法律特征，适用性和内容上（广泛）相似。在实践中，UP尤其受到专业人士（作为管理合同的规则）和仲裁法院（作为管理规则或补充其他文书）的好评。 PECL并没有取得类似的成功，但是随着欧洲朝着进一步加强合同法统一的方向发展，PECL很有可能发挥作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号