首页> 外文期刊>Design Studies >From Design Methods to Future-Focused Thinking: 50 years of design research
【24h】

From Design Methods to Future-Focused Thinking: 50 years of design research

机译:从设计方法到面向未来的思维:50年的设计研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Design Research Society was founded in 1966 following the Conference on Design Methods held at Imperial College London in 1962 (Jones & Thornley, 1963). In the lead up to the 50th anniversary DRS2016 conference we contacted the secretary to the 1962 conference, Peter Slann, who now lives in Scotland, and who sent us the original reel-to-reel audio tape recordings of the 1962 conference. Listening to those tapes it is striking not only how similar to today are some of the discussions about design and design research, but also how much has changed - in 1962 every voice is a clipped, male, British voice. One comment at the end of the conference stands out as significant. Thanking people for coming to the conference and looking towards the future at the end of the closing session, John Page, then Professor of Building Science at Sheffield University, asks the audience three questions (the quote is verbatim): 'if one agrees that there are bodies of knowledge that have been raised here, which need further exploration - particularly a case in point would be the terminology of design -is there any point in trying to get some kind of inter-disciplinary working party going on these problems? In this question of disciplines, is there any machinery or any way of arranging for an interchange of information between specialists and people working at Universities? Lastly, is there any point in making the whole thing more of a formal entity, a society, or something of that kind?'
机译:在1962年于伦敦帝国学院举行的设计方法会议之后(1966年,Jones和Thornley),设计研究协会成立于1966年。在DRS2016会议召开50周年之前,我们联系了1962年会议的秘书彼得·斯兰(Peter Slann),他现在居住在苏格兰,并向我们发送了1962年会议的原始线到盘录音带录音。听这些录音带,不仅令人震惊的是,关于设计和设计研究的某些讨论与今天有多相似,而且还发生了很大变化-1962年,每个声音都是英国男性的固定声音。会议结束时的一则评论非常重要。感谢人们参加会议并在闭幕会议结束时展望未来,当时谢菲尔德大学建筑科学教授约翰·佩奇(John Page)向听众提出三个问题(引述是逐字记录):“如果有人同意是否在这里提出了一些知识体系,需要进一步探索-特别是在设计术语方面就是一个典型的例子-是否有试图让某种跨学科工作组解决这些问题的意义?在这个学科问题中,是否存在任何机制或任何方式安排专家与大学工作人员之间的信息交换?最后,是否有必要使整个事情更多地成为一个正式的实体,一个社会或类似的东西?”

著录项

  • 来源
    《Design Studies》 |2017年第1期|A1-A8|共8页
  • 作者

    Peter Lloyd;

  • 作者单位

    School of Architecture and Design, University of Brighton,Brighton, UK;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号