The design thinking approaches of three different groups of designers based on self- reports

G. Goldschmidt

首页> 外文期刊>Design Studies >The design thinking approaches of three different groups of designers based on self- reports

【24h】

The design thinking approaches of three different groups of designers based on self- reports

机译：基于自我报告的三组不同设计师的设计思维方法

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This paper compares the design thinking approaches of three groups of student-designers: industrial design and architecture undergraduates, and design PhD candidates. Participants responded to an open-ended design brief, working individually. Upon submission of their designs they were debriefed about their design processes. We compare the groups based on their submissions and self-reported design activities, especially the sequence of their design activities and the time allotted to them. There were some commonalities and differences between the two undergraduate groups but the main differences were between the two undergraduates and the PhD students. On the basis of the findings we pose questions regarding design methods in the era of 'design thinking' wherein designers are required to adopt an entrepreneurial frame of mind.

机译：本文比较了三组学生设计师的设计思维方法：工业设计和建筑专业的本科生以及设计博士学位的候选人。参与者对不限成员名额的设计简介做出了回应，并单独进行工作。在提交他们的设计后，他们就他们的设计过程进行了汇报。我们根据提交的内容和自我报告的设计活动（尤其是设计活动的顺序和分配的时间）对小组进行比较。两个本科生群体之间存在一些共性和差异，但主要差异在于两个本科生和博士生之间。基于这些发现，我们提出了有关“设计思维”时代的设计方法的问题，在这个时代中，设计师需要采用企业家的心态。

著录项

来源
《Design Studies》 |2013年第4期|454-471|共18页
作者
G. Goldschmidt;
展开▼
作者单位

Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, Technion - Israel institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa 32000, Israel Paul A. Rodgers, School of Design, Northumbria University, Newcastle- upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, UK;

展开▼
收录信息美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
design methodology; design process; inclusive design;

机译：设计方法;设计过程;包容性设计;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Fostering Design Culture Through Cultivating the User-Designers' Design Thinking and Systems Thinking [J] . Mingfen Li Systemic Practice and Action Research . 2002,第5期

机译：通过培养用户设计师的设计思维和系统思维来培养设计文化
2. The Shortcomings of Design Thinking when Compared to Designerly Thinking [J] . Linda Nhu Laursen, Louise Møller Haase The design journal . 2019,第6期

机译：设计思维与设计思维相比的缺点
3. Supporting communication between product designers and engineering designers in the design process of branded products: a comparison of three approaches [J] . Golnoosh Rasoulifar, Claudia Eckert, Guy Prudhomme International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts . 2014,第2期

机译：在品牌产品的设计过程中支持产品设计师和工程设计师之间的交流：三种方法的比较
4. Ta-Da! You're a design thinker! Validating the DesignShop as a Model for Teaching Design Thinking to Non-Designers and Achieving Systemic Re-Design in the Education System [C] . Jessica Asly Artiles, Katherine E. LeVine American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition . 2015

机译：ta-da！你是一个设计师！验证设计商店作为向非设计者进行教学设计的模型，并在教育系统中实现系统性重新设计
5. The Civic-Minded Instructional Designers (CMID) framework: Educating instructional designers with community-based service-learning approaches. [D] . Yusop, Farrah Dina. 2010

机译：公民意识的教学设计师（CMID）框架：使用基于社区的服务学习方法来教育教学设计师。
6. Value-Based Assessment of Radiology Reporting Using Radiologist-Referring Physician Two-Way Feedback System—a Design Thinking-Based Approach [O] . Faiq Shaikh, Kenneth Hendrata, Brian Kolowitz, 2017

机译：基于放射科医生参考医师双向反馈系统的放射报告价值评估：一种基于设计思维的方法
7. The design thinking approaches of three different groups of designers based on self-reports [O] . Goldschmidt, Gabriela, Rodgers, Paul 2013

机译：基于自我报告的三组不同设计师的设计思维方法

The design thinking approaches of three different groups of designers based on self- reports

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅