首页> 外文期刊>Design Studies >Assessing perceived credibility of traditional and computer generated architectural representations
【24h】

Assessing perceived credibility of traditional and computer generated architectural representations

机译:评估传统和计算机生成的体系结构表示的可信度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents a study that investigated whether computer generated representations are perceived as more credible means of communicating design than traditional forms of representations. Architects, other professionals, and elected members of the public assessed two computer generated and two hand drawn forms of representation using semantic differential scales. Results show that computer generated photomontage is perceived as the most credible and perspective drawing and as the least credible form of representation. Statistical analysis revealed a remarkable resemblance between the responses by the public and professionals and clear differences between these two groups and architects' perceptions.
机译:本文提出了一项研究,该研究调查了计算机生成的表示形式是否被视为比传统形式的表示形式更可信的设计交流手段。建筑师,其他专业人员和当选的公众使用语义差分量表评估了两种计算机生成的表示形式和两种手绘形式的表示形式。结果表明,计算机生成的蒙太奇图像被认为是最可信,最透视的图形,也是最不可信的表示形式。统计分析表明,公众和专业人士的回答之间有着惊人的相似之处,而这两个群体与建筑师的看法之间也存在明显差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号