• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BioTechnology: An Indian Journal >The internet enterprise innovation and antitrust control policies - get 360?￠????s complaints in tencent?￠????s abuse of domination in market position as an example
【24h】

The internet enterprise innovation and antitrust control policies - get 360?￠????s complaints in tencent?￠????s abuse of domination in market position as an example

机译：互联网企业创新和反托拉斯控制政策-以360度的腾讯投诉为例-滥用市场支配地位的例子

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Innovation is the vitality for enterprises, especially for the Internet companies. In March 2013, the "Tencent" ruling from the high court in Guangdong province got Tencent’s Market behavior for investigation. namely whether the "alternative" constitutes exclusive transaction and sell behavior have the anticompetitive effect, or have a competition to promote reasonable analysis of effect and efficiency to enhance effect. The conclusion on the basis of this unavoidably be questioned because of the lack of scientific nature. To determine whether a Internet enterprise's behavior constitutes an abuse of dominant market position, and whether we need to take responsibility of anti-monopoly law, the first thing you need to understand is whether the Internet business model is generally used to enterprise technology innovation, market competition and efficiency. Second, Tencent don't have the obligation to competition law on product line, so the "alternative" behavior without criticism. Although the antitrust issues of Internet industry will meet the new situation, but not enough to overturn all the logic to antitrust regulation. Have the exclusive controlling to the Internet enterprise behavior, we have to stick to the principle of prudent regulation.
机译：创新是企业，尤其是互联网公司的生命力。 2013年3月，广东省高等法院的“腾讯”裁决对腾讯的市场行为进行了调查。即，“替代”构成排他性交易和出售行为是否具有反竞争效果，或通过竞争促进对效果的合理分析并提高效率。由于缺乏科学性，以此为基础的结论不可避免地受到质疑。要确定互联网企业的行为是否构成滥用市场支配地位以及我们是否需要承担反垄断法的责任，您需要了解的第一件事是互联网业务模型是否通常用于企业技术创新，市场竞争和效率。其次，腾讯没有义务在产品系列上实行竞争法，因此“替代”行为无需受到批评。尽管互联网行业的反托拉斯问题将迎接新形势，但不足以推翻反托拉斯监管的所有逻辑。对互联网企业的行为拥有唯一的控制权，我们必须坚持审慎监管的原则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号