...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Ethics >Are there morally relevant differences between hymen restoration and bloodless treatment for Jehovah’s Witnesses?
【24h】

Are there morally relevant differences between hymen restoration and bloodless treatment for Jehovah’s Witnesses?

机译:处女膜的修复和对耶和华见证人的无血处理之间在道德上有区别吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Hymen reconstruction is a controversial measure performed to help young females under threat of honour-related violence. Official guidelines often reject offering hymen reconstructions. On the other hand, extraordinary measures in order to enable operations of Jehovah’s Witnesses who want a bloodless operation in order to avoid religiously related sanctions are often considered praiseworthy. The aim is thus to examine whether or not there are relevant differences between these two measures. Discussion We identified twelve potential differences. One difference could be considered relevant (patient-safety), but in favour of hymenoplastic operations. Summary Since we did not identify enough relevant differences to justify offering bloodless operations to Jehovah’s Witnesses but not offering hymen reconstruction due to honour-related norms, we conclude that these two groups of patients should be treated equally. This means that neither of the patient groups should be offered these extraordinary operations or that both groups of patients should be offered such operations. Similarly, there are no reasons for judging those who perform the operations differently.
机译:背景技术处女膜重建术是一项有争议的措施,旨在帮助年轻女性面对与名誉有关的暴力威胁。官方指南经常拒绝提供处女膜重建。另一方面,为了使希望进行不流血手术的耶和华见证人能够采取行动而避免与宗教有关的制裁的非凡措施,通常被认为值得赞扬。因此,目的是检查这两种措施之间是否存在相关差异。讨论我们确定了十二种潜在差异。一种差异可以被认为是相关的(患者安全性),但有利于进行处女膜手术。总结由于我们没有找到足够的相关差异来证明为耶和华见证人提供无血手术,但由于与荣誉有关的规范而没有提供处女膜重建的合理性,因此我们得出结论,应平等对待这两类患者。这意味着不应为这两个患者组提供任何非常规手术,也不应为两组患者都提供此类非常规手术。同样,也没有理由对执行这些操作的人员进行不同的判断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号