...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making >A review on the relation between simulation and improvement in hospitals
【24h】

A review on the relation between simulation and improvement in hospitals

机译:医院模拟与改进之间的关系研究述评

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Simulation applications on operations management in hospitals are frequently published and claim to support decision-making on operations management subjects. However, the reported implementation rates of recommendations are low and the actual impact of the changes recommended by the modeler has hardly been examined. This paper examines: 1) the execution rate of simulation study recommendations, 2) the research methods used to evaluate implementation of recommendations, 3) factors contributing to implementation, and 4) the differences regarding implementation between literature and practice. Results Altogether 16 hospitals executed the recommendations (at least partially). Implementation results were hardly reported upon; 1 study described a before-and-after design, 2 a partial before and after design. Factors that help implementation were grouped according to 1) technical quality, of which data availability, validation/verification with historic data/expert opinion, and the development of the conceptual model were mentioned most frequently 2) process quality, with client involvement and 3) outcome quality with, presentation of results. The survey response rate of traceable authors was 61%, 18 authors implemented the results at least partially. Among these responses, evaluation methods were relatively better with 3 time series designs and 2 before-and-after designs. Conclusions Although underreported in literature, implementation of recommendations seems limited; this review provides recommendations on project design, implementation conditions and evaluation methods to increase implementation. Methods A literature review in PubMed and Business Source Elite on stochastic simulation applications on operations management in individual hospitals published between 1997 and 2008. From those reporting implementation, cross references were added. In total, 89 papers were included. A scoring list was used for data extraction. Two reviewers evaluated each paper separately; in case of discrepancies, they jointly determined the scores. The findings were validated with a survey to the original authors.
机译:背景技术医院运营管理中的模拟应用程序经常发布,并声称可以支持有关运营管理主题的决策。但是,报告的建议实施率很低,并且几乎没有研究过建模者建议的更改的实际影响。本文研究了:1)模拟研究建议的执行率; 2)用于评估建议实施情况的研究方法; 3)促成实施的因素; 4)文献与实践之间的实施差异。结果总共有16家医院(至少部分地)执行了建议。几乎没有报告执行结果; 1项研究描述了前后设计,2项描述了设计前后的局部设计。帮助实施的因素根据以下方面进行了分组:1)技术质量,其中经常提到数据可用性,具有历史数据/专家意见的验证/验证以及概念模型的开发2)涉及客户的过程质量和3)结果质量,结果表示。可追踪作者的调查答复率为61%,有18位作者至少部分实施了调查结果。在这些响应中,使用3个时间序列设计和2个前后设计的评估方法相对更好。结论尽管文献中报道不足,但建议的实施似乎有限。这次审查提供了有关项目设计,实施条件和评估方法的建议,以增加实施。方法在1997年至2008年之间,发表在PubMed和Business Source Elite上的有关随机模拟在个别医院的运营管理中的应用的文献综述。在报告实施的基础上,添加了交叉引用。总共包括89篇论文。使用评分表进行数据提取。两位审稿人分别评估了每篇论文;如果有出入,他们共同确定分数。通过对原始作者的调查验证了研究结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号