• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Reliability of Multiple Mini-Interviews and traditional interviews within and between institutions: a study of five California medical schools
【24h】

Reliability of Multiple Mini-Interviews and traditional interviews within and between institutions: a study of five California medical schools

机译：机构内部和机构之间进行多次迷你访谈和传统访谈的可靠性：对五所加州医学院的研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Many medical schools use admissions Multiple Mini-Interviews (MMIs) rather than traditional interviews (TIs), partly because MMIs are thought to be more reliable. Yet prior studies examined single-school samples of candidates completing either an MMI or TI (not both). Using data from five California public medical schools, the authors examined the within- and between-school reliabilities of TIs and MMIs. The analyses included applicants interviewing at ≥1 of the five schools during 2011–2013. Three schools employed TIs (TI1, TI2, TI3) and two employed MMIs (MMI1, MMI2). Mixed linear models accounting for nesting of observations within applicants examined standardized TI and MMI scores (mean?=?0, SD?=?1), adjusting for applicant socio-demographics, academic metrics, year, number of interviews, and interview date. A total of 4993 individuals (completing 7516 interviews [TI?=?4137, MMI?=?3379]) interviewed at ≥1 school; 428 (14.5%) interviewed at both MMI schools and 687 (20.2%) at more than one TI school. Within schools, inter-interviewer consistency was generally qualitatively lower for TI1, TI2, and TI3 (Pearson’s r 0.07, 0.13, and 0.29, and Cronbach’s α, 0.40, 0.44, and 0.61, respectively) than for MMI1 and MMI 2 (Cronbach’s α 0.68 and 0.60, respectively). Between schools, the adjusted intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.27 (95% CI 0.20–0.35) for TIs and 0.47 (95% CI 0.41–0.54) for MMIs. Within and between-school reliability was qualitatively higher for MMIs than for TIs. Nonetheless, TI reliabilities were higher than anticipated from prior literature, suggesting TIs may not need to be abandoned on reliability grounds if other factors favor their use.
机译：许多医学院使用招生多次迷你面试（MMI）而不是传统面试（TI），部分原因是人们认为MMI更可靠。然而，先前的研究检查的是完成MMI或TI（不是两者）的候选人的单一学校样本。作者使用来自加州五所公立医学院的数据，研究了TI和MMI在校内和校内的可靠性。分析包括2011-2013年间在五所学校中≥1所面试的申请人。三所学校雇用了TI（TI1，TI2，TI3），两所雇用了MMI（MMI1，MMI2）。混合线性模型考虑了申请人内部的观察嵌套，检查了标准的TI和MMI分数（平均值= 0，SD = 1），并针对申请人的社会人口统计学，学术指标，年份，访谈次数和访谈日期进行了调整。 ≥1所学校的总共4993个人（完成了7516次访谈[TI？=？4137，MMI？=？3379]）;在两所MMI学校中，有428名（14.5％）接受了面试，在一所TI学校中，有687名（20.2％）接受了采访。在学校内部，与TIMI，TI2和TI3（Pearson分别为0.07、0.13和0.29，Cronbach'sα，0.40、0.44和0.61）相比，访谈者之间的一致性通常在质量上低于MMI1和MMI 2（Cronbach'sα）。分别为0.68和0.60）。在学校之间，TI的调整后的组内相关系数为0.27（95％CI 0.20–0.35），而MMI的调整后的组内相关系数为0.47（95％CI 0.41–0.54）。从质量上来说，MMI的学校内部和学校之间的可靠性要高于TI的学校。但是，TI的可靠性高于先前文献的预期，这表明如果其他因素支持TI的使用，则可能无需出于可靠性的考虑而放弃TI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号