...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC International Health and Human Rights >Sampling challenges in a study examining refugee resettlement
【24h】

Sampling challenges in a study examining refugee resettlement

机译:研究难民安置的研究中的抽样挑战

获取原文
           

摘要

Background As almost half of all refugees currently under United Nations protection are from Afghanistan or Iraq and significant numbers have already been resettled outside the region of origin, it is likely that future research will examine their resettlement needs. A number of methodological challenges confront researchers working with culturally and linguistically diverse groups; however, few detailed articles are available to inform other studies. The aim of this paper is to outline challenges with sampling and recruitment of socially invisible refugee groups, describing the method adopted for a mixed methods exploratory study assessing mental health, subjective wellbeing and resettlement perspectives of Afghan and Kurdish refugees living in New Zealand and Australia. Sampling strategies used in previous studies with similar refugee groups were considered before determining the approach to recruitment Methods A snowball approach was adopted for the study, with multiple entry points into the communities being used to choose as wide a range of people as possible to provide further contacts and reduce selection bias. Census data was used to assess the representativeness of the sample. Results A sample of 193 former refugee participants was recruited in Christchurch (n = 98) and Perth (n = 95), 47% were of Afghan and 53% Kurdish ethnicity. A good gender balance (males 52%, females 48%) was achieved overall, mainly as a result of the sampling method used. Differences in the demographic composition of groups in each location were observed, especially in relation to the length of time spent in a refugee situation and time since arrival, reflecting variations in national humanitarian quota intakes. Although some measures were problematic, Census data comparison to assess reasonable representativeness of the study sample was generally reassuring. Conclusions Snowball sampling, with multiple initiation points to reduce selection bias, was necessary to locate and identify participants, provide reassurance and break down barriers. Personal contact was critical for both recruitment and data quality, and highlighted the importance of interviewer cultural sensitivity. Cross-national comparative studies, particularly relating to refugee resettlement within different policy environments, also need to take into consideration the differing pre-migration experiences and time since arrival of refugee groups, as these can add additional layers of complexity to study design and interpretation.
机译:背景信息由于目前在联合国保护下的所有难民中,几乎有一半来自阿富汗或伊拉克,并且已有大批难民重新安置在原籍地区之外,因此有可能进行进一步的研究,以研究他们的安置需求。与文化和语言上不同的群体合作的研究人员面临着许多方法上的挑战;但是,很少有详细的文章可用于其他研究。本文的目的是概述在社会上无形的难民群体中进行抽样和招募所面临的挑战,描述为评估居住在新西兰和澳大利亚的阿富汗和库尔德难民的心理健康,主观幸福感和安置视角而进行的混合方法探索性研究所采用的方法。在确定招募方法之前,已考虑了先前针对类似难民群体的研究所采用的抽样策略。方法采用雪球法进行研究,其中有多个进入社区的入口点,用于选择尽可能多的人,以提供更多的人接触并减少选择偏见。人口普查数据用于评估样品的代表性。结果在基督城(n = 98)和珀斯(n = 95)招募了193名前难民参与者,其中47%是阿富汗人,53%是库尔德人。总体而言,性别平衡良好(男性52%,女性48%),这主要是由于采用了抽样方法。观察到每个地点各群体的人口构成存在差异,特别是在难民情况下花费的时间长短和到达后的时间有关,反映了国家人道主义配额的获得情况。尽管某些措施存在问题,但总体上可以放心进行人口普查数据比较以评估研究样本的合理代表性。结论雪球采样具有多个起始点以减少选择偏差,对于定位和识别参与者,提供保证并打破障碍是必需的。私人联系对于招聘和数据质量均至关重要,并强调了访调员文化敏感性的重要性。跨国比较研究,尤其是与不同政策环境中的难民安置有关的跨国比较研究,也需要考虑到不同的移民前经历和自难民群体抵达以来的时间,因为这会增加研究设计和解释的复杂性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号