首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Assessment of Junior Doctor performance: a validation study
【24h】

Assessment of Junior Doctor performance: a validation study

机译:初级医生绩效评估:一项验证研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background In recent years, Australia has developed a National Junior Doctor Curriculum Framework that sets out the expected standards and describes areas of performance for junior doctors and through this has allowed a national approach to junior doctor assessment to develop. Given the significance of the judgments made, in terms of patient safety, development of junior doctors, and preventing progression of junior doctors moving to the next stage of training, it is essential to develop and validate assessment tools as rigorously as possible. This paper reports on a validation study of the Junior Doctor Assessment Tool as used for PGY1 doctors to evaluate the psychometric properties of the instrument and to explore the effect of length of experience as a PGY1 on assessment scores. Methods This validation study of the Australian developed Junior Doctor Assessment Tool as it was used in three public and other associated hospitals in Western Australia for PGY1 across a two year period addressed two core aims, namely: (1) to evaluate the psychometric properties of the instrument; (2) to explore the effect of length of experience as a PGY1 on assessment scores. Results The highest mean scores were for professional behaviours, teamwork and interpersonal skills and the lowest were for procedures. Most junior doctors were assessed three or more times and scores were not different in the first rotation compared to subsequent rotations. While statistically significant, there appeared to be little practical influence on scores obtained by the number of times they were assessed. Principal component analysis identified two principal components of junior doctor performance are being assessed rather than the commonly reported three. A Cronbach Alpha of .883 was calculated for the 10 item scale. Conclusions Now that the components of the tool have been analysed it will be more meaningful and potentially more influential to consider these factors on the potential educational impact of this assessment process for monitoring junior doctor development and progression.
机译:背景技术近年来,澳大利亚制定了《全国初级医生课程框架》,该框架规定了预期的标准并描述了初级医生的绩效领域,并由此发展了全国初级医生评估方法。考虑到所作判断的重要性,就患者安全,初级医生的发展以及防止初级医生进入下一阶段培训的进展而言,至关重要的是,应尽可能严格地开发和验证评估工具。本文报告了用于PGY1医生的初级医生评估工具的有效性研究,以评估该仪器的心理计量学特性,并探讨作为PGY1的工作年限对评估分数的影响。方法这项澳大利亚开发的初级医生评估工具的验证研究在两年内被西澳大利亚州的三所公立医院和其他相关医院用于PGY1,验证了两个核心目标,即:(1)评估该医生的心理计量学特性。仪器; (2)探索作为PGY1的经验时间长度对评估分数的影响。结果最高的平均得分是专业行为,团队合作和人际交往能力,最低的是程序。大多数初级医生接受了3次或更多次评估,并且第一轮与随后的轮换得分没有差异。虽然统计意义显着,但似乎对分数评估次数所获得的分数几乎没有实际影响。主成分分析确定正在评估初级医生表现的两个主要成分,而不是通常报告的三个。对于10个项目的规模,计算得出的Cronbach Alpha为.883。结论既然已经对该工具的组成部分进行了分析,那么考虑这些因素对评估初级医生的发展和进程的评估过程的潜在教育影响将具有更大的意义和影响力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号