首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Training tomorrow's doctors in diabetes: self-reported confidence levels, practice and perceived training needs of post-graduate trainee doctors in the UK. A multi-centre survey
【24h】

Training tomorrow's doctors in diabetes: self-reported confidence levels, practice and perceived training needs of post-graduate trainee doctors in the UK. A multi-centre survey

机译:对明天的糖尿病医生进行培训:英国研究生培训医生的自我报告的自信心水平,实践和感知的培训需求。多中心调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To assess the confidence, practices and perceived training needs in diabetes care of post-graduate trainee doctors in the UK. Methods An anonymised postal questionnaire using a validated 'Confidence Rating' (CR) scale was applied to aspects of diabetes care and administered to junior doctors from three UK hospitals. The frequency of aspects of day-to-day practice was assessed using a five-point scale with narrative description in combination with numeric values. Respondents had a choice of 'always' (100%), 'almost always' (80–99%), 'often' (50–79%), 'not very often' (20–49%) and 'rarely' (less than 20%). Yes/No questions were used to assess perception of further training requirements. Additional 'free-text' comments were also sought. Results 82 doctors completed the survey. The mean number of years since medical qualification was 3 years and 4 months, (range: 4 months to 14 years and 1 month). Only 11 of the respondents had undergone specific diabetes training since qualification. 4(5%) reported 'not confident' (CR1), 30 (37%) 'satisfactory but lacked confidence' (CR2), 25 (30%) felt 'confident in some cases' (CR3) and 23 (28%) doctors felt fully confident (CR4) in diagnosing diabetes. 12 (15%) doctors would always, 24 (29%) almost always, 20 (24%) often, 22 (27%) not very often and 4 (5%) rarely take the initiative to optimise gcaemic control. 5 (6%) reported training in diagnosis of diabetes was adequate while 59 (72%) would welcome more training. Reported confidence was better in managing diabetes emergencies, with 4 (5%) not confident in managing hypoglycaemia, 10 (12%) lacking confidence, 22 (27%) confident in some cases and 45 (55%) fully confident in almost all cases. Managing diabetic ketoacidosis, 5 (6%) doctors did not feel confident, 16 (20%) lacked confidence, 20 (24%) confident in some cases, and 40 (50%) felt fully confident in almost all cases. Conclusion There is a lack of confidence in managing aspects of diabetes care, including the management of diabetes emergencies, amongst postgraduate trainee doctors with a perceived need for more training. This may have considerable significance and further research is required to identify the causes of deficiencies identified in this study.
机译:目的评估英国研究生培训医生对糖尿病护理的信心,实践和感知培训需求。方法:采用经过验证的“置信度”(CR)量表的匿名邮政调查表应用于糖尿病护理方面,并向英国三所医院的初级医生进行管理。使用带有叙述性描述的五点量表和数字值来评估日常练习的频率。受访者可以选择“总是”(100%),“几乎总是”(80-99%),“经常”(50-79%),“不是很频繁”(20-49%)和“很少”(少于20%)。是/否问题用于评估对进一步培训要求的看法。还寻求其他“自由文本”评论。结果82位医生完成了调查。自获得医疗资格以来的平均年数为3年4个月(范围:4个月至14年1个月)。自从资格认证以来,只有11名受访者接受了特定的糖尿病培训。 4(5%)表示“不自信”(CR1),30(37%)“满意但缺乏信心”(CR2),25(30%)表示“在某些情况下有信心”(CR3)和23(28%)医生对诊断糖尿病充满信心(CR4)。 12(15%)名医生将始终,24(29%)名几乎总是,20(24%)名经常,22(27%)名不是很频繁,而4名(5%)很少主动地优化血糖控制。 5(6%)的糖尿病诊断培训足够,而59(72%)的患者欢迎接受更多培训。报告的信心在控制糖尿病紧急情况方面更好,其中4(5%)对控制低血糖没有信心,10(12%)缺乏信心,在某些情况下有22(27%)信心,在几乎所有情况下有45(55%)完全信心。处理糖尿病性酮症酸中毒时,有5(6%)的医生没有信心,有16(20%)的人没有信心,在某些情况下有20(24%)的信心,在几乎所有情况下有40(50%)的人充满信心。结论在认为需要更多培训的研究生培训医生中,在管理糖尿病护理方面(包括糖尿病紧急情况的管理)缺乏信心。这可能具有相当重要的意义,需要进一步的研究来确定本研究中发现的缺陷的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号