...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Biomedical human kinetics >Quality of life, assertiveness, and personality dimensions in elderly men
【24h】

Quality of life, assertiveness, and personality dimensions in elderly men

机译：老年人的生活质量，自信心和人格特征

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Study aim: To assess quality of life, assertiveness associated with aging personalities, and personality dimensions as related to age, highest level of qualification, and place of residence of elderly males. Material and methods: Elderly (n = 1269) men were chosen from the clubs for the elderly from settlements in one of the poorest counties in Hungary. The sample was divided into groups according to their age (60-69 years old; 70 years old and above), education (primary, secondary/higher), and place of residence (village-town). Quality of life was assessed by Quality of Life – OLD (WHOQOL-OLD), assertiveness was measured by the Rathus assertiveness schedule, and personality characteristics were measured by the Big Five Questionnaire. Results: Predominantly, relatively low levels of the quality of life, assertiveness, and personality of elderly males were noticed. In none of the scales, no significant gender- or education-related differences were found; however, men living in a town had higher (p<0.05) levels of Sociability (3.49 vs. 3.42), Emotions (3.01 vs. 2.94), Openness (3.18 vs. 3.08), and Conscientiousness (3.37 vs. 3.30) and lower levels of Self-efficacy (0.31 vs. 0.69) than those living in villages. Conclusions: Age and level of education do not seem to have a meaningful effect on elderly men’s quality of life, assertiveness, and personality characteristics; however, elderly living in villages have fewer opportunities for successful ageing.
机译：研究目的：评估生活质量，与衰老人格相关的自信心以及与年龄，最高资格水平和老年男性居住地有关的人格维度。材料和方法：从匈牙利最贫穷的县之一的定居点的老年人俱乐部中选出老年人（n = 1269）。根据年龄（60-69岁; 70岁及以上），受教育程度（小学，中学/高等）和居住地（村镇）将样本分为几类。生活质量通过生活质量-老（WHOQOL-OLD）进行评估，自信通过Rathus自信表进行评估，人格特征通过五项问卷进行评估。结果：主要观察到老年男性的生活质量，自信和个性水平较低。在两个量表中，均未发现与性别或教育相关的重大差异;但是，居住在城镇中的男子的社交能力（3.49 vs. 3.42），情感（3.01 vs. 2.94），开放度（3.18 vs.3.08）和尽责（3.37 vs.30）较高（p <0.05），并且较低自我效能水平（0.31比0.69）要高于乡村居民。结论：年龄和受教育程度似乎对老年人的生活质量，自信和人格特征没有有意义的影响;然而，生活在乡村中的老年人成功衰老的机会较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号