...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Classical Bulletin >Feminism and Classics VI: Crossing Borders, Crossing Lines
【24h】

Feminism and Classics VI: Crossing Borders, Crossing Lines

机译：女权主义与经典六：跨越国界，跨越界线

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Ancient Mediterranean society was crisscrossed by multipleboundaries and borders. Firm boundaries between male and female, slave and free, gods and mortals (to name just a few) defined socialidentities and relationships, even as these lines were regularlycrossed in religious ritual, social practices and artistic imagination. Incurrent scholarship, Feminism is now Feminisms, encouragingmultiple, and even transgressive, approaches to the study of women, gender, and sexuality in the ancient world. But has Feminism itselfbecome a boundary, dividing fields of study or generations of scholars?Or is it a threshold, encouraging crossings between literary, historicaland archaeological evidence? What new approaches are scholarsusing to push the boundaries of the evidence and the limits of ourknowledge of the ancient world?
机译：古老的地中海社会充满了多重边界和边界。男性与女性，奴隶与自由，神与凡人之间的牢固界限（仅举几例）定义了社会身份和人际关系，即使这些界线在宗教仪式，社会实践和艺术想象中经常出现交叉。在目前的学术研究中，女权主义现在是女权主义，它鼓励对古代世界中的女性，性别和性行为进行研究的多种甚至是超越性的方法。但是女权主义本身是否已成为界限，划分了研究领域或学者世代？还是它是一个起点，鼓励了文学，历史和考古证据之间的交叉？学者们正在采用哪些新方法来突破证据的界限和了解古代世界的界限？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号