...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cadernos EBAPE.BR >Understanding the concept of public sphere in social management: ideas for an empirical-descriptive and normative reconstruction
【24h】

Understanding the concept of public sphere in social management: ideas for an empirical-descriptive and normative reconstruction

机译：理解社会管理中公共领域的概念：基于经验，描述性和规范性重构的构想

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article aims to reconstruct the concept of public sphere as an empirical-descriptive and normative category of research in social management. In this process, it is revealed that the concept of public sphere has been criticized and reformulated in the works of Habermas (1962; 1981; 1992) and the most current conceptions cover a plurality of publics, interests, opinions, conflicting dimensions and oppressive potentials. This article is a theoretical essay and incudes an extensive bibliographical research focused mainly on the literature on “social management” and the “public sphere”. Several gaps and limitations were identified on the understanding of the public sphere by studies in the field of social management. Considering the limitations as learning processes, this article aims to move forward from new elements. The article argues that if the public sphere is considered a locus of social management research (normative and empirical-descriptive) it is important to highlight that: (1) the public sphere- is a locus of consensus and conflict; (2) the public sphere can be concretely constituted of democratic, emancipatory, and oppressive elements; (3) it is formed by a diversity of publics (and counter-publics) with different ‘capacities’ of access and argumentation; (4) in Brazil there was a formation of a subordinate public sphere; (5) the characteristics of public sphere formation cannot be imported, and (6) the effectiveness of the public sphere is influenced by systemic structures. This article shows that reconstruction of the concept of public sphere defends the descriptive, normative and critical potential of public sphere, especially if it is explored considering Habermas, his commentators and critics.
机译：本文旨在重构公共领域的概念，将其作为社会管理研究的经验描述和规范类别。在这个过程中，揭示了公共领域的概念在哈贝马斯（1962; 1981; 1992）的著作中受到了批评和重新定义，最新概念涵盖了多个公众，利益，观点，矛盾的维度和压迫性潜力。 。本文是一篇理论文章，涉及范围广泛的书目研究，主要研究“社会管理”和“公共领域”方面的文献。通过社会管理领域的研究，在对公共领域的理解上发现了一些空白和局限。考虑到学习过程的局限性，本文旨在从新要素入手。该文章认为，如果将公共领域视为社会管理研究的一个场所（规范性和实证性描述），则必须强调：（1）公共领域是共识和冲突的场所; （2）公共领域可以具体地由民主，解放和压迫因素组成; （3）它是由具有不同“接触和论证”能力的公众（和反对公众）组成的; （4）在巴西形成了下属的公共领域; （5）公共领域形成的特征不能被引入，（6）公共领域的有效性受到系统结构的影响。本文表明，对公共领域概念的重构捍卫了公共领域的描述性，规范性和批判性潜力，特别是如果考虑到哈贝马斯，他的评论者和评论家来探索它的话。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号