• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Catalogue and Index >Social cataloguing: a discussion on LibraryThing and Goodreads
【24h】

Social cataloguing: a discussion on LibraryThing and Goodreads

机译：社会编目：关于图书馆的东西和好书的讨论

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Goodreads and LibraryThing are the two most popular social cataloguing sites on the Web: sites that allow users to catalogue their own books using metadata and slick interfaces. In March 2013, Goodreads announced that it would be acquired by Amazon.com. This transaction prompted much wailing and gnashing of teeth in the bibliotwittoblogosphere with users worried about the impact that Amazon.com – a commercial bookseller – would have on Goodreads' previously neutral online community of book-lovers. Following this announcement, the author of this article decided to compare the two sites to see if Amazon.com's acquisition is an indicator of superior quality and to explore the phenomenon of social cataloguing (1).
机译：Goodreads和LibraryThing是Web上两个最受欢迎的社交目录网站：允许用户使用元数据和光滑界面对自己的图书进行目录的网站。 2013年3月，Goodreads宣布它将被Amazon.com收购。这项交易在书店里引起了很多哀痛和咬牙切齿，用户担心亚马逊（商业书商）会对Goodreads以前中立的在线书迷社区产生影响。宣布这一消息后，本文的作者决定比较这两个站点，以了解Amazon.com的收购是否表明其质量较高，并探讨了社交编目现象（1）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号