• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cogent Social Sciences >Unpacking research ethical stands and practices in academic institutions: A case study of a university from Ethiopia
【24h】

Unpacking research ethical stands and practices in academic institutions: A case study of a university from Ethiopia

机译：揭开学术机构的研究伦理立场和实践：来自埃塞俄比亚的一所大学的案例研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The present work attempts to address the ethical stands and practices of research integrity among early career professionals in social sciences research in one of the Ethiopian Universities. The major goal of the research was unpacking the institutional research ethics stands and practices, taking a case study in one institution. The method of the research was document analysis and discussion with authorities research offices. The documents assessed were, university research proposal evaluation guidelines, national research review ethics guideline, proposals initiated by young academics and completed second-degree theses in two departments, and Research Ethics Policy (2016) of the institution. The results revealed, there is a weak institutional stand towards social science research ethics. There is no single document applied in managing the ethical realms of researches among the academic staffs and students. Among the assessed 41 documents, only 29.26% tried to practice partial ethical consideration in the proposals and theses. The rest 70.74% documents never stated a word about ethics. Even those documents did not show the complete process of the researches, the challenges encountered, and failed to attach evidences in the documents. Therefore, stand towards research ethics is marginalized, and research ethical practices among the researchers, mentors, and supervisors are destructed. At this scenario, it positive to conclude that the issues of research ethics will be a challenge to the university in general and to the careers of young professionals in particular. Therefore, it needs absolute priority before too late to manage the gap.
机译：本工作试图解决其中一所埃塞俄比亚大学社会科学研究早期职业专业人员的道德立场和研究诚信实践。该研究的主要目的是在一个机构中进行个案研究，以揭示机构研究伦理立场和实践。研究的方法是文件分析和与权威研究机构的讨论。评估的文件包括：大学研究计划评估指南，国家研究审查伦理准则，由年轻学者发起并在两个部门完成二级学位论文的计划，以及该机构的研究伦理政策（2016年）。结果显示，在社会科学研究伦理方面，制度立场薄弱。没有任何文件可用于管理学术人员和学生之间的研究伦理领域。在评估的41份文件中，只有29.26％试图在提案和论文中进行部分道德考虑。其余70.74％的文件从未提及道德。甚至那些文件都没有显示研究的完整过程，遇到的挑战，并且没有在文件中附加证据。因此，对研究伦理的立场被边缘化了，并且破坏了研究人员，导师和管理者之间的研究伦理实践。在这种情况下，很容易得出结论，研究伦理问题将对整个大学，特别是对年轻专业人员的职业构成挑战。因此，在管理差距之前需要绝对优先。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号