...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>CBE Life Sciences Education >Broadening the Study of Participation in the Life Sciences: How Critical Theoretical and Mixed-Methodological Approaches Can Enhance Efforts to Broaden Participation
【24h】

Broadening the Study of Participation in the Life Sciences: How Critical Theoretical and Mixed-Methodological Approaches Can Enhance Efforts to Broaden Participation

机译：拓宽生命科学领域的参与研究：批判性理论和混合方法如何增强拓宽参与程度的工作

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This research methods Essay details the usefulness of critical theoretical frameworks and critical mixed-methodological approaches for life sciences education research on broadening participation in the life sciences. First, I draw on multidisciplinary research to discuss critical theory and methodologies. Then, I demonstrate the benefits of these approaches for researchers who study diversity and inclusion issues in the life sciences through examples from two critical mixed-methods studies of prominent issues in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) participation and recognition. The first study pairs critical discourse analysis of the STEM workforce literature, data, and underlying surveys with quantitative analyses of STEM pathways into the workforce. This example illustrates the necessity of questioning popular models of retention. It also demonstrates the importance of intersecting demographic categories to reveal patterns of experience both within and between groups whose access to and participation in STEM we aim to improve. The second study’s critical approach applies research on inequities in prizes awarded by STEM professional societies toward organizational change. This example uses data from the life sciences professional societies to show the importance of placing data within context to broaden participation and understand challenges in creating sustainable change.
机译：该研究方法论文详细介绍了重要的理论框架和重要的混合方法论方法对于生命科学教育研究在扩大生命科学领域的参与度的有用性。首先，我利用多学科研究来讨论批判理论和方法论。然后，我通过两个关于科学，技术，工程和数学（STEM）参与和认可方面的突出问题的关键混合方法研究的实例，说明了这些方法对研究生命科学中的多样性和包容性问题的研究人员的好处。第一项研究将对STEM劳动力文献，数据和基础调查的批判性话语分析与对STEM劳动力进入途径的定量分析相结合。这个例子说明了质疑流行的保留模型的必要性。它还显示了相交人口统计学类别的重要性，以揭示我们旨在改善其对STEM的访问和参与的组内和组之间的经验模式。第二项研究的批判性方法将STEM专业协会授予的奖项不平等的研究应用于组织变革。该示例使用了生命科学专业协会的数据来说明将数据置于上下文中以扩大参与范围并了解在创造可持续变化中所面临的挑战的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号