首页> 外文期刊>College & Research Libraries >The Scholarly Impact of Books Acquired via Approval Plan Selection, Librarian Orders, and Patron-Driven Acquisitions as Measured by Citation Counts
【24h】

The Scholarly Impact of Books Acquired via Approval Plan Selection, Librarian Orders, and Patron-Driven Acquisitions as Measured by Citation Counts

机译:通过批准计划选择,图书管理员命令和赞助人获得的图书(通过引用计数衡量)获得的书本的学术影响力

获取原文
           

摘要

Patron-driven acquisition has been an important, if contentious, topic for decades, with numerous programs having been piloted, adopted, and reported on, largely favorably, in the library literature. Still, questions and doubts persist for academic libraries, especially where the composition of vendor plans and packages and the judgment of patrons are concerned. Past literature has approached the assessment of patron-driven acquisition by analyzing circulation/usage, comparing peer-library holdings, seeking patrons’ or librarians’ judgments of utility and suitability, looking for evidence of collection imbalances, and testing for overlap in patrons’ and librarians’ purchases. To contribute to this literature, this study addresses scholarly impact and examines whose selections—approval plans’, librarians’, or patrons’—have been most heavily cited. For the social sciences, the sciences, and the humanities, the authors gathered topic-matched random samples of books acquired via approval plans and librarian orders during the first five years of operation of their institutions’ interlibrary loan purchase-on-demand patron-driven acquisition program and compared their citation counts to the counts of books acquired via the program. Google Scholar was employed to tally citations.
机译:几十年来,以赞助人为主导的收购一直是一个重要的主题,即使有争议,许多计划已经在图书馆文献中得到了试验,采用和报道,这在很大程度上是有利的。尽管如此,学术图书馆仍存有疑问和疑惑,特别是在涉及供应商计划和包装的组成以及顾客判断的地方。过去的文献已经通过分析流通/使用情况,比较同等图书馆馆藏,寻求顾客或图书馆员对实用性和适用性的判断,寻找馆藏不平衡的证据以及测试顾客与顾客之间的重叠来评估顾客驱动的获取。图书馆员的购买。为了对这些文献做出贡献,本研究探讨了学术影响力,并研究了引用最多的人的选择(批准计划,图书管理员或赞助人)。对于社会科学,科学和人文科学,作者收集了在其机构图书馆间按需贷款购买者赞助的运营的头五年中,通过批准计划和图书馆员命令获得的与主题匹配的随机样本样本采集程序,并将其引用计数与通过该程序获得的图书计数进行比较。 Google学术搜索被用来统计引用次数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号