...
【24h】

The IS Core - V: Defining the IS Core

机译:IS核心-V:定义IS核心

获取原文
           

摘要

Information Systems and other academic fileds struggle with what is termed an identity crisis. For Information Systems, an ongoing debate focuses on defining the field narrowly versus broadly. Defining the field narrowly, as called for by Benbesat and Zmud's nomological core [2003] is compelling because it distinctly defines what is IS research and what is not. Those who find the distinctness of IS lacking may find this a pragmatic solution. However, the narrow definition excludes a large portion of the IS community and their research. Alter's [2003] Systems in Organizations proposal broadly defines the IS discipline in an inclusive way that embraces our historic diversity and makes IS distinct too.
机译:信息系统和其他学术界正在努力应对所谓的身份危机。对于信息系统,正在进行的辩论集中在狭义定义还是广义定义。正如Benbesat和Zmud的法理学核心[2003]所要求的那样,狭窄地定义这个领域很有吸引力,因为它清楚地定义了什么是IS研究,什么不是IS研究。那些发现IS缺乏独特性的人可能会发现这是一个务实的解决方案。但是,狭义的定义排除了IS社区及其研究的很大一部分。 Alter的[2003]组织中的系统提议以一种包容性的方式广义地定义了IS学科,它包含了我们的历史多样性,也使IS变得与众不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号