...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology >Comparison of Three Different Methods for Measuring Classical Pathway Complement Activity
【24h】

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Measuring Classical Pathway Complement Activity

机译:三种测量经典途径补体活性的方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The complement system plays an important role in host defense against infection and in most inflammatory processes. The standard 50% hemolytic complement (CH50) assay is the most commonly used method of screening patient sera for functional activity of the classical complement pathway. Our objective in this study was to compare two newer methods (the enzyme immunoassay and the liposome immunoassay) to a commercial CH50 assay for measuring total classical complement activity. We conclude that both newer methods compare well with a CH50 assay and are equally sensitive in screening routine clinical sera.
机译:补体系统在宿主抵抗感染和大多数炎症过程中起着重要作用。标准的50%溶血补体(CH 50 )测定法是筛查患者血清中经典补体途径功能活性的最常用方法。我们在这项研究中的目的是将两种较新的方法(酶免疫测定法和脂质体免疫测定法)与用于测量总经典补体活性的商用CH 50 测定法进行比较。我们得出的结论是,这两种新方法均与CH 50 测定法比较好,并且在筛查常规临床血清中同样敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号