...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Stomatologica Croatica >Maintenance Requirements of Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses Opposed by Either Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses or Natural Teeth: 5 Years Results
【24h】

Maintenance Requirements of Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses Opposed by Either Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses or Natural Teeth: 5 Years Results

机译：植入物支持的固定假体或天然牙对置的植入物维护要求：5年结果

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

AIM: To compare the maintenance requirements of implant supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant supported fixed prostheses natural teeth or complete dentures. METHOD: The maintenance requirements were obtained by examining the dental records of 15 people, of whom 6 were edentulous in both arches and 9 edentulous in one arch. The results were compared to those obtained from 22 edentulous people in whom implants had been used in the mandible (control group). All the patients were treated with Nobel Biocare implants using standard implant and prosthetic protocols. RESULTS: The main maintenance requirement was the need to repair part of the superstructure. The artificial teeth and the acrylic resin had to be repaired on 44 occasions in the group with implants in both jaws and 14 occasions in the group with implants opposed by natural teeth. This compared with 2 occasions in the control group. Similarly the group with implants in both jaws were more likely to fracture the gold alloy framework, an event which occurred on 6 occasions. The Kruskal- Wallis one way analysis of variance on ranks was used to identify significant differences and Dunn’s method of All Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures was used to distinguish which group differed from the other. The group with implants in both jaws was significantly different to the other two groups in relation to the higher incidence of fracture of the teeth and acrylic resin superstructure (p CONCLUSION: The maintenance requirements of implant supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant supported fixed prostheses are much greater than when opposed by natural teeth or complete dentures.
机译：目的：比较种植体支撑固定假体与天然牙或全口义齿对置的维护要求。方法：通过检查15人的牙科记录来获得维护要求，其中两个牙弓分别是6例和一个牙弓是9例。将结果与从22位无牙的下颌骨中使用植入物的人（对照组）进行了比较。所有患者均使用标准植入物和修复方案用Nobel Biocare植入物进行治疗。结果：主要的维护要求是需要修复上部结构的一部分。假牙和丙烯酸树脂必须在两组中均用两颗下颌植入物修复，而在该组中有14次需要用天然牙对着植入物进行修复。对照组中有2次。同样，在两个颚中都带有植入物的组更可能使金合金框架断裂，该事件发生了6次。使用Kruskal-Wallis的方差方差分析的一种方法来识别显着差异，使用Dunn的“所有成对多重比较程序”的方法来区分哪一组与另一组不同。在牙齿的骨折和丙烯酸树脂上层结构的发生率较高的方面，在两个颌骨中均具有植入物的组与其他两组明显不同（p结论：与植入物支撑的固定修复体相反，植入物支撑的固定修复体的维护要求非常高）大于天然牙齿或全口义齿的相对强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号