...
首页> 外文期刊>African Journal of Agricultural Research >Evaluation of the effect of genotype, environment and genotype X environment interaction on white common bean varieties using additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis in the mid-altitude of Bale zone, Southeastern Ethiopia
【24h】

Evaluation of the effect of genotype, environment and genotype X environment interaction on white common bean varieties using additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis in the mid-altitude of Bale zone, Southeastern Ethiopia

机译:利用加性主效应和乘性交互作用(AMMI)分析评估埃塞俄比亚东南部贝尔地区中高海拔地区基因型,环境和基因型X环境互作对白色普通豆品种的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Twelve white common bean genotypes were evaluated along two checks at three diverse locations in the mid-altitude of Bale zone, southeastern Ethiopia for two consecutive years 2014 and 2015 in order to determine their stability. The genotype by environment interaction (GEI) has an influence on the selection and recommendation of cultivars. The objective of this work was to see the effect of GEI and evaluate the adaptability and stability of productivity of twelve white common bean genotypes using additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model.? The combined analysis of variance over locations revealed highly significant differences among the genotypes, locations and genotypes by location interaction. Among the 14 genotypes, the maximum grain yield over locations was obtained by genotype (G5) ICN Bunsi X S X B 405/5C-1C-1C-51 (2.05t/ha) followed by (G11) ICN Bunsi X S X B 405/7C-1C-1C-30 (1.96t/ha), and the site that gave the maximum grain yield was Ginir (2.16t/ha). The results of AMMI analysis indicated that the first four AMMI (AMMI-AMMI4) were highly significant (P<0.01). The GEI - was two times higher than that of the genotype effect, suggesting the possible existence of different environment groups. Based on the stability parameters like AMMI stability value (ASV), G12, G5, G7, G11, G3 and G13 were found to be as stable cultivars, respectively. As stability per se is not a desirable selection criterion and the most stable genotypes would not necessarily give the best yield performance, simultaneous consideration of grain yield and ASV in a single non-parametric index were also considered in identification of best varieties. Based on the Genotype Selection Index (GSI), which considers both the ASV and mean grain yield, genotype G5 and G11 were identified as stable genotypes for the study areas.
机译:2014年和2015年连续两年在埃塞俄比亚东南部的贝尔地区中海拔的三个不同地点,通过两次检查评估了十二种白色普通豆基因型,以确定它们的稳定性。环境相互作用的基因型(GEI)对品种的选择和推荐有影响。这项工作的目的是观察GEI的作用,并使用加性主效应和乘性交互作用(AMMI)模型评估十二种白色普通豆基因型的生产力的适应性和稳定性。位置差异的综合分析显示,通过位置相互作用,基因型,位置和基因型之间存在显着差异。在这14个基因型中,通过基因型(G5)ICN Bunsi XSXB 405 / 5C-1C-1C-51(2.05t / ha)获得了最大的谷物产量,其次是(G11)ICN Bunsi XSXB 405 / 7C-1C- 1C-30(1.96t / ha),获得最大谷物产量的地点是吉尼尔(2.16t / ha)。 AMMI分析结果表明,前四个AMMI(AMMI-AMMI4)高度显着(P <0.01)。 GEI-是基因型效应的两倍,表明可能存在不同的环境群体。根据AMMI稳定性值(ASV)等稳定性参数,发现G12,G5,G7,G11,G3和G13分别为稳定品种。由于稳定性本身并不是理想的选择标准,并且最稳定的基因型不一定会提供最佳的产量表现,因此在确定最佳品种时也考虑了在单个非参数指标中同时考虑谷物产量和ASV。基于考虑到ASV和平均谷物产量的基因型选择指数(GSI),基因型G5和G11被确定为研究区域的稳定基因型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号