...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of applied sciences >Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks based on Random Way Point Mobility Model | Science Publications
【24h】

Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks based on Random Way Point Mobility Model | Science Publications

机译：基于随机路径点移动性模型的两种Ad-hoc网络按需路由协议的性能比较|科学出版物

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

> Ad hoc networks are characterized by multihop wireless connectivity, frequently changing network topology and the need for efficient dynamic routing protocols plays an important role. We compare the performance of two prominent on-demand routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks: Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), Ad Hoc On-demand distance Vector Routing (AODV). A detailed simulation model with MAC and physical layer models is used to study the interlayer interactions and their performance implications. We demonstrate that even though DSR and AODV share similar on-demand behavior, the differences in the protocol mechanisms can lead to significant performance differentials. In this paper we examine two on demand routing protocols AODV and DSR based on packet delivery ratio, normalized routing load, normalized MAC load, average end to end delay by varying the number of sources, speed and pause time.
机译： > Ad hoc网络的特点是多跳无线连接，频繁变化的网络拓扑以及对有效动态路由协议的需求起着重要作用。我们比较了两种针对移动自组织网络的重要按需路由协议的性能：动态源路由（DSR），自组织按需距离矢量路由（AODV）。使用具有MAC和物理层模型的详细仿真模型来研究层间交互作用及其性能含义。我们证明，即使DSR和AODV共享类似的按需行为，协议机制中的差异也可能导致明显的性能差异。在本文中，我们根据数据包的传输率，归一化路由负载，归一化MAC负载，平均端到端延迟（通过更改源数，速度和暂停时间）来检查两种按需路由协议AODV和DSR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号