...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Insights >Editorial
【24h】

Editorial

机译：社论

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

When work on the OAPEN-UK project first started in 2010, open access (OA) monographs were something of a niche concern. These were the days before Knowledge Unlatched and the Open Library of the Humanities, the days before most commercial publishers offered an open access option for books – the days before RCUK’s open access policy became a strong, funded mandate rather than a set of well-intentioned but unevenly enforced guidelines. Generally speaking, awareness of open access was much stronger in scientific, technical and medical (STM) than in humanities and social sciences (HSS) subjects, and the bestestablished publication routes were through pure or hybrid open access journals, plus (in some disciplines and territories) long-standing subject or institutional repositories. Books were hardly thought of at all.
机译：当OAPEN-UK项目的工作于2010年首次启动时，开放获取（OA）专论是一个利基问题。这是在知识解锁和人文开放图书馆之前的日子，在大多数商业出版商提供图书的开放访问选项之前的日子，即RCUK的开放访问政策成为强有力的，有资金支持的授权之前，而不是出于良好意图的几天。但执行准则不均衡。一般而言，科学，技术和医学（STM）领域的开放获取意识比人文和社会科学（HSS）学科要强得多，并且最佳建立的出版途径是通过纯或混合开放获取期刊，加上（在某些学科和领土）​​长期存在的主题或机构存储库。根本没有想到书籍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号